Moving territorialities
Main Article Content
Abstract
Urban spaces, now under a globalization process, assess a growing multitude of official territories (institutional, administrative and political divisions such as municipalities
and regions) and non-concrete territorialities (social groups building global/local relations). Always changing in the everyday urban life, they present extra complexities for those who cope with cities management. The drawing ofthe formal territory becomes old-fashioned, considering the magnitude of new relations over urban spaces and the multitude of new interests and needs. Built up by social movements, new territorialities do not divide the space as a mosaic or as an one-thousand-piece puzzle, but are compounded of what one could call fragments of a kaleidoscope outlining the anachronism of other hounderies.
The overlay of such territories/territorialities and the difficulties of the planning are discussed in this paper.
and regions) and non-concrete territorialities (social groups building global/local relations). Always changing in the everyday urban life, they present extra complexities for those who cope with cities management. The drawing ofthe formal territory becomes old-fashioned, considering the magnitude of new relations over urban spaces and the multitude of new interests and needs. Built up by social movements, new territorialities do not divide the space as a mosaic or as an one-thousand-piece puzzle, but are compounded of what one could call fragments of a kaleidoscope outlining the anachronism of other hounderies.
The overlay of such territories/territorialities and the difficulties of the planning are discussed in this paper.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Ultramari, C., Cardoso, N. A., & Moura, R. (1995). Moving territorialities. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 29(4), 6 a 13. Retrieved from https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/8256
Issue
Section
Article
The Brazilian Journal of Public Administration (RAP) undertakes to contribute to the protection of authors’ intellectual rights. On this matter:
- It uses the Creative Commons BY (CC-BY) license for all texts it publishes, except when there is indication of specific holders of copyrights and property rights;
- It uses the similarity verification software of content - Plagiarism (Crossref Similarity Check);
- It takes actions to fight against plagiarism and ethical misconduct aligned with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Further information on the Code of Ethics adopted by RAP can be found in Ethical Standards and Code of Conduct.