Public expenditure composition and fiscal decentralization in Brazilian local governments: an analysis through unconditional quantile regression with longitudinal data
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper investigates the effect of increasing fiscal decentralization on the composition of public expenditures of Brazilian local governments. The research is innovative, demonstrating that the heterogeneity of expenditure scale influences the correlation between fiscal decentralization and public expenditure of local governments. The sample consisted of unbalanced panel data of 5,565 municipalities for 17 years from 2000 to 2016. The analysis used unconditional quantile regression with panel data. The main findings were: (i) fiscal decentralization affects public expenditure in Brazilian local governments. However, this effect depends on local expenditure scale and fiscal decentralization strategy. For example, the median coefficient was negative in personnel expenditures, and the effect was positive for the third quartile of local governments, when fiscal decentralization was measured by the tax revenue over total revenue. On the other hand, the effects were also positive for median and third quartile regarding intergovernmental transfers per capita like proxy of fiscal decentralization; (ii) the measures (proxies) of fiscal decentralization are correlated with the composition of public expenditure; (iii) in median terms, fiscal decentralization has greater effects on investment expenditures than on current and personnel expenditures; and (iv) in median terms, the tax revenue participation promotes an increase in administrative and planning expenditures instead of expenditures in social functions. Fiscal decentralization measured by intergovernmental transfer per capita has more positive effects on social functions than on legislative and administrative functions.
Downloads
Article Details
The Brazilian Journal of Public Administration (RAP) undertakes to contribute to the protection of authors’ intellectual rights. On this matter:
- It uses the Creative Commons BY (CC-BY) license for all texts it publishes, except when there is indication of specific holders of copyrights and property rights;
- It uses the similarity verification software of content - Plagiarism (Crossref Similarity Check);
- It takes actions to fight against plagiarism and ethical misconduct aligned with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Further information on the Code of Ethics adopted by RAP can be found in Ethical Standards and Code of Conduct.
References
Agénor, P. R. (2011). Schooling and public capital in a model of endogenous growth. Economica, 78(309), 108-132.
Alegre, J. G. (2010). Decentralization and the composition of public expenditure in Spain. Regional Studies, 44(8), 1067-1083.
Araújo, C. E. L., Gonçalves, G. Q., & Machado, J. A. (2017). Os municípios brasileiros e os gastos próprios com saúde: algumas associações. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 22(3), 953-963.
Arends, H. (2017). More with less? Fiscal decentralisation, public health spending and health sector performance. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(2), 144-174.
Baskaran, T., Feld, L. P., & Schnellenbach, J. (2014, setembro). Fiscal federalism, decentralization and economic growth: Survey and meta-analysis (CESifo working paper No. 4985). Munich, Germany: CESifo.
Bénassy-Quéré, A., Gobalraja, N., & Trannoy, A. (2007). Tax and public input competition. Economic Policy, 22(50), 386-430.
Bird, R. M. (2018). Fiscal decentralisation and decentralising tax administration: different questions, different answers. In A. Valdesalici, & F. Palermo (Eds.), Comparing fiscal federalism (Studies in territorial and cultural diversity governance, Vol. 10, pp. 190-220). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill Nijhoff.
Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1980). The power to tax: Analytic foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Busemeyer, M. R. (2008). The impact of fiscal decentralisation on education and other types of spending. Swiss Political Science Review, 14(3), 451-481.
Cantarero, D., & Pascual, M. (2008). Analysing the impact of fiscal decentralization on health outcomes: empirical evidence from Spain. Applied Economics Letters, 15(2), 109-111.
Del Granado, F. J. A., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & McNab, R. M. (2018). Decentralized governance, expenditure composition, and preferences for public goods. Public Finance Review, 46(3), 359-388.
Dias, B. P., Nossa, V., & Monte-Mor, D. S. (2018). O investimento público influencia na reeleição? Um estudo empírico nos municípios do estado do Espírito Santo. Revista de Administração Pública, 52(5), 880-898.
Faguet, J. P. (2004). Does decentralization increase government responsiveness to local needs? Evidence from Bolivia. Journal of public economics, 88(3-4), 867-893.
Firpo, S., Fortin, N. M., & Lemieux, T. (2009). Unconditional quantile regressions. Econometrica, 77(3), 953-973.
Fiva, J. H. (2006). New evidence on the effect of fiscal decentralization on the size and composition of government spending. FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis, 62(2), 250-280.
Grisorio, M. J., & Prota, F. (2015). The impact of fiscal decentralization on the composition of public expenditure: panel data evidence from Italy. Regional Studies, 49(12), 1941-1956.
Guedes, K. P., & Gasparini, C. E. (2007). Descentralização fiscal e tamanho do governo no Brasil. Economia Aplicada, 11(2), 303-323.
Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American economic review, 35(4), 519-530.
Jia, J., Guo, Q., & Zhang, J. (2014, março). Fiscal decentralization and local expenditure policy in China. China Economic Review, 28, 107-122.
Kappeler, A., & Välilä, T. (2008). Fiscal federalism and the composition of public investment in Europe. European Journal of Political Economy, 24(3), 562- 570.
Martinez‐Vazquez, J., Lago‐Peñas, S., & Sacchi, A. (2017). The impact of fiscal decentralization: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(4), 1095-1129.
Martinez-Vazquez, J., & McNab, R. M. (2003). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth. World development, 31(9), 1597-1616.
Melo, C. A. V. D., Souza, S. S. D., & Bonfim, W. L. D. S. (2015). Federalismo e bons governos: uma análise política da gestão fiscal dos municípios. Opinião Pública, 21(3), 673-692.
Mendes, M. (2005). Capture of fiscal transfers: a study of Brazilian local governments. Economia aplicada, 9(3), 427-444.Mosca, I. (2006). Is decentralisation the real solution? A three country study. Health policy, 77(1), 113-120.
Musgrave, R. A. (1959). Theory of public finance; a study in public economy. New York, NY: McGraw- Hill.
Neyapti, B. (2013). Fiscal decentralization, fiscal rules and fiscal discipline. Economics Letters, 121(3), 528-532.
Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Oates, W. E. (1985). On the nature and measurement of fiscal illusion: a survey. In G. Brennan, B. S. Grewal, & P. Groenewegen (Eds.), Taxation and fiscal federalism: essays in honour of Russell Mathews (pp. 65-82). Sydney, Australia: Australian National University Press.
Oates, W. E. (1988). On the measurement of congestion in the provision of local public goods. Journal of Urban Economics, 24(1), 85-94.
Pansani, D. A., Serrano, A. L. M., & Ferreira, L. O. G. (2020). Análise de evidências e causas do efeito flypaper e da ilusão fiscal nos Estados e municípios brasileiros. Administração Pública e Gestão Social, 12(3), 1-19.
Rodríguez-Pose, A., Tijmstra, S. A., & Bwire, A. (2009). Fiscal decentralisation, efficiency, and growth. Environment and Planning A, 41(9), 2041- 2062.
Rogoff, K. (1990). Equilibrium political budget cycles. The American Economic, 80(1), 21-36.
Rogoff, K., & Sibert, A. (1988). Elections and macroeconomic policy cycles. The review of economic studies, 55(1), 1-16.
Sacchi, A., & Salotti, S. (2016). A comprehensive analysis of expenditure decentralization and of the composition of local public spending. Regional Studies, 50(1), 93-109.
Sakurai, S. N. (2009). Ciclos políticos nas funções orçamentárias dos municípios brasileiros: uma análise para o período 1990-2005 via dados em painel. Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), 39(1), 39-58.
Sakurai, S. N. (2013). Efeitos assimétricos das Transferências Governamentais sobre os gastos públicos locais: evidências em painel para os municípios brasileiros. Pesquisa e Planejamento Econômico, 43(2), 309-332.
Smith, H. J. M. (2012). Fiscal decentralization and development: an analysis of city governments in Argentina and Mexico, 1980-2010 (Tese de Doutorado). Florida International University, Miami, FL.
Thiessen, U. (2003). Fiscal decentralisation and economic growth in high‐income OECD Countries. Fiscal studies, 24(3), 237-274.
Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of political economy, 64(5), 416-424.
Tufte, E. R. (1978). Political control of the economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Videira, R. A., & Mattos, E. (2011). Ciclos políticos eleitorais e a interação espacial de políticas fiscais entre os municípios brasileiros. Economia Aplicada, 15(2), 259-286.
Weingast, B. R. (2014, janeiro). Second generation fiscal federalism: Political aspects of decentralization and economic development. World Development, 53, 14-25.