Authoritarian planning and socienvironmental dissaray in the Amazonian region: a chronicle of population displacement in Tucuruí
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper contains an analysis of the mechanisms through which the authoritarian planning contributed to the worsening of social and environmental disarray in the Amazonian Region of Brazil. Recomposing the process of compulsory displacement and relocation of the populations, triggered when the reservoir of the Hidroelectric Plant of Tucuruí, in the State of Pará, was being filled, the author could observe that:
a) the absence of a policy established through negotiations with legitimate social spokesmen has been a factor which only contributed to intensify the opposition of local populations towards the whole undertaking;
b) casuistic solutions have proved to be incapable of responding to the social and juridical complexity of the physical space comprised by the program of relocation;
c) the vagueness involving the limits of the area to be flooded has enlarged and diversified conflicts associated with the program of relocation;
d) the lack of an attuning between the executive chronology fixed for the construction of the dam and the one foreseeing the filling up of the reservoir has given place to a socially damaging incompatibility between the indemnities and an effective relocation. By turning the populations affected by the changes into groups political1y disqualified and culturally deprived of their character, the authoritarian planning, when applied to hydroelectric projects, produces on local societies true "mercantile shocks", brought about by the lack of information and by uncertainty.
Downloads
Article Details
The Brazilian Journal of Public Administration (RAP) undertakes to contribute to the protection of authors’ intellectual rights. On this matter:
- It uses the Creative Commons BY (CC-BY) license for all texts it publishes, except when there is indication of specific holders of copyrights and property rights;
- It uses the similarity verification software of content - Plagiarism (Crossref Similarity Check);
- It takes actions to fight against plagiarism and ethical misconduct aligned with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Further information on the Code of Ethics adopted by RAP can be found in Ethical Standards and Code of Conduct.