La inteligencia en la gestión pública: un análisis desde una perspectiva institucional
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Estudios recientes señalan que las barreras para la transición y la estructuración de un gobierno inteligente parecen menos tecnológicas y más institucionales. Para ello, este artículo brinda un aporte original aún no abordado en la literatura, con el objetivo de analizar las dimensiones de la inteligencia en la gestión pública bajo el lente de la teoría institucional y, a partir del debate teórico, desarrollar un modelo de institucionalización de la inteligencia en la gestión pública. Con el fin de validar las cuatro categorías definidas a partir del análisis teórico (estructura organizacional, estructura tecnológica, capital humano y compromiso social), con las respectivas dimensiones de inteligencia (uso de datos e información externa; cultura organizacional para la inteligencia; uso efectivo de tecnologías (big data; business intelligence); toma de decisiones basada en evidencia; colaboración interdepartamental e interorganizacional; organización y unificación de bases de datos; agilidad del gobierno; eficiencia y eficacia de la gestión; compromiso social; innovación, cocreación, inteligencia colectiva), se decidió utilizar la técnica de clasificación de tarjetas. Los resultados apuntan a la importancia de incorporar elementos desde la perspectiva institucional para la legitimación de la inteligencia en el gobierno. Asimismo, a partir del análisis de la etapa de clasificación de tarjetas, los resultados demuestran concordancia en la clasificación de ítems por constructo propuesto, presentándose como una oportunidad futura del modelo a ser probado cuantitativamente.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
La Revista de Administração Pública (RAP) se compromete a contribuir con la protección de los derechos intelectuales del autor. En ese sentido:
- Adopta la licencia Creative Commoms BY (CC-BY) en todos los textos que publica, excepto cuando hay una indicación de titulares específicos de derechos de autor y derechos de propiedad;
- Adopta software de verificación de similitud de contenido - Plagio (Crossref Similarity Check);
- Adopta acciones para combatir el plagio y la mala conducta ética, alineado con las directrices del Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Más detalles del Código de Ética adoptado por RAP pueden ser vistos en Normas éticas y Código de conducta.
Citas
Abrucio, F. L. (2007). Recent trajectory of the Brazilian public management: a critical assessment and the renewal of the reform agenda. Revista de Administração Pública, 41(Especial), 67-86. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122007000700005
Algebri, H. K., Husin, Z., Abdulhussin, A. M., & Yaakob, N. (2017, outubro). Why Move toward the Smart Government? In Proceedings Computer Science and Intelligent Controls (ISCSIC), Budapest, Hungary.
Anthopoulos, L. G., & Reddick, C. G. (2016). Understanding electronic government research and smart city: a framework and empirical evidence. Information Polity, 21(1), 99-117. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-150371
Bernardes, M. B., Andrade, F. P., Novais, P., & Lopes, N. V. (2017). Reference model and method of evaluation for smart cities in government portals: a study of the Portuguese and Brazilian reality. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia, New York, NY.
Bojovic, Z., Klipa, D., Secerov, E., & Senk, V. (2017). Smart government – from information to smart society. Journal of the Institute of Telecommunications Professionals, 11(3), 34-39
Brânzaş, B. V., & Radu, I. (2015). Transformation of public management process due to competitive intelligence implementation. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, 694-701. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01451-3
Calof, J. (2017). Reflections on the Canadian Government in competitive intelligence– programs and impacts. Foresight, 19(1), 31-47. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-08-2016-0038
Cepik, M. A. C. (1997). Inteligência, política e poder no Estado contemporâneo. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 9, 193-196.
Chen, S. C., Miau, S., & Wu, C. C. (2014). Toward a Smart Government: An Experience of E-invoice Development in Taiwan. In Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Chengdu, China.
Choo, C. W. (2002). Information management for the intelligent organization: the art of scanning the environment. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
Davenport, T. H. (1998). Ecologia da informação: porque só a tecnologia não basta para o sucesso na era da informação. São Paulo, SP: Futura.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Eom, S. J., Choi, N., & Sung, W. (2016). The use of smart work in government: empirical analysis of Korean experiences. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 562-571. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.005
Gascó-Hernandez, M. (2018). Building a smart city: lessons from Barcelona. Communications of the ACM, 61(4), 50-57. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1145/3117800
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Helbig, N., & Ojo, A. (2014, junho). Being smart: emerging technologies and innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 31(S1), 11-18. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.09.001
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Pardo, T. A., & Aldama-Nalda, A. (2013). Smart cities and smart governments: using information technologies to address urban challenges. In Proceedings of the 14º Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, New York, NY.
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Zhang, J., & Puron-Cid, G. (2016). Conceptualizing smartness in government: An integrative and multi-dimensional view. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 524-534. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.03.002
Guenduez, A. A., Mettler, T., & Schedler, K. (2020). Technological frames in public administration: What do public managers think of big data? Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 101406. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101406
Guenduez, A. A., Singler, S., Tomczak, T., Schedler, K., & Oberli, M. (2018). Smart Government success factors. Yearbook of Swiss Administrative Sciences, 9(1), 96-110. Recuperado de http://doi.org/10.5334/ssas.124
Guimarães, A. V., Cabral, S., Ribeiro, P. F., & Costa, M. M. (2021). Inovação e colaboração governamental para recuperar veículos roubados e furtados. Administração Pública e Gestão Social, 13(4), 2175-5787. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.21118/apgs.v13i4.12274
Halaweh, M. (2018). Artificial intelligence government (Gov.3.0): the UAE leading model. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 62, 269-272. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.11210
Harsh, A., & Ichalkaranje, N. (2015). Transforming e-government to smart government: a South Australian perspective. In L. C. Jain, S. Patnaik, & N. Ichalkaranje (Eds.), Intelligent Computing, Communication and Devices (pp. 9-16). New Delhi, India: Springer.
Hidayat, T., & Kurniawan, N. B. (2017, setembro). Smart city service system engineering based on microservices architecture. Case study: Government of Tangerang city. In Proceedings of ICT For Smart Society (ICISS), Tangerang, Indonesia.
Janissek-Muniz, R., & Blanck, M. R. (2014). Weak signals management, entrepreneurship and uncertainty: a relational theoretical essay under the perspective of intelligence. In Anais do 11º CONTECSI - International conference on information systems and technology management, São Paulo, SP.
Janissek-Muniz, R., Freitas, H., & Lesca, H. (2007). A inteligência estratégica antecipativa e coletiva como apoio ao desenvolvimento da capacidade de adaptação das organizações. In Anais do 4º CONTECSI - International conference on information systems and technology management, São Paulo, SP.
Jiménez, C. E., Solanas, A., & Falcone, F. (2014). E-government interoperability: Linking open and smart government. Computer, 47(10), 22-24. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2014.281
Johnston, E. W., & Hansen, D. L. (2011). Design lessons for smart governance infrastructures. In A. P. Balutis, T. F. Buss, & D. Ink (Eds.), Transforming American governance: Rebooting the public square (pp. 197- 212). New York, NY: Routledge.
Juniawan, M. A., Sandhyaduhita, P., Purwandari, B., Yudhoatmojo, S. B., & Dewi, M. A. A. (2017). Smart government assessment using Scottish Smart City Maturity Model: a case study of Depok city. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS), Bali, Indonésia.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (vol. 2). New York, NY: Wiley.
Kennedy, R. (2016). E-regulation and the rule of law: Smart government, institutional information infrastructures, and fundamental values. Information Polity, 21(1), 77-98. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-150368
Kliksberg, B. (2000). Rebuilding the state for social development: towards ‘smart government’. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66(2), 241-257. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852300662002
Kumar, A., & Sharma, A. (2017, dezembro). Systematic literature review on opinion mining of big data for government intelligence. Webology, 14(2), 6-47. Recuperado de http://www.webology.org/2017/v14n2/a156.pdf
Lesca, H., & Janissek-Muniz, R. (2015). Inteligência estratégica antecipativa e coletiva: o método LE SCAnning. Porto Alegre, RS: Pallotti.
Li, Z., & Liao, Q. (2018). Economic solutions to improve cybersecurity of governments and smart cities via vulnerability markets. Government Information Quarterly, 35(1), 151-160. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.10.006
Linders, D., Liao, C. Z. P., & Wang, C. M. (2015). Proactive e-governance: flipping the service delivery model from pull to push in Taiwan. Government information quarterly, 35(4), S68-S76. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.08.004
Liu, X., & Zheng, L. (2015). Cross-departmental collaboration in one-stop service center for smart governance in China: factors, strategies and effectiveness. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), S54-S60. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.12.001
Malomo, F., & Sena, V. (2017). Data intelligence for local government? Assessing the benefits and barriers to use of big data in the public sector. Policy & Internet, 9(1), 7-27. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.141
McBride, K., Aavik, G., Kalvet, T., & Krimmer, R. (2018). Co-creating an open government data driven public service: the case of Chicago’s Food Inspection Forecasting Model. In Proceedings of the 51º Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa Village, HI. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2018.309
Melati, C., & Janissek-Muniz, R. (2020). Governo inteligente: análise de dimensões sob a perspectiva de gestores públicos. Revista de Administração Pública, 54(3), 400-415. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220190226
Mellouli, S., Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Zhang, J. (2014). Smart government, citizen participation and open data. Information Polity, 19(1), 1-4. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-140334
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Mergel, I., Rethemeyer, R. K., & Isett, K. (2016). Big data in public affairs. Public Administration Review, 76(6), 928-937. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12625
Miau, S., Wu, C. C., & Chen, S. C. (2014). Toward a smart government-an experience of E-invoice development in Taiwan. In Proceedings of the 18º Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Chengdu, China.
Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003, outubro). Innovation in the public sector. Recuperado de http://www.sba.oakland.edu/faculty/mathieson/mis524/resources/readings/innovation/innovation_in_the_public_sector.pdf
Mu, R., Haershan, M., & Wu, P. (2022, janeiro). What organizational conditions, in combination, drive technology enactment in government-led smart city projects? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121220. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121220
Nahm, A. Y., Rao, S. S., Solis-Galvan, L. E., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2002). The Q-sort method: assessing reliability and construct validity of questionnaire items at a pre-testing stage. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 1(1), 15. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1020255360
Nam, T. (2016). Government-driven participation and collective intelligence: a case of the government 3.0 initiative in Korea. Information, 7(4), 55. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.3390/info7040055
Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Smart city as urban innovation. In Proceedings of the 185º ICEGOV - International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, New York, NY.
Paes de Paula, A. P. (2005). Administração pública brasileira entre o gerencialismo e a gestão social. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 45(1), 36-49. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902005000100005
Paula, G. D., & Rover, A. J. (2012). O governo eletrônico e a atividade de inteligência. Revista Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônico, 6, 216-236.
Przeybilovicz, E., Cunha, M. A., Macaya, J. F. M., & Albuquerque, J. P. D. (2018). A tale of two “smart cities”: investigating the echoes of new public management and governance discourses in smart city projects in Brazil. In Proceedings of the 51º Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa Village, HI. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2018.314
Rezende, D. A. (2012). Planejamento de estratégias e informações municipais para cidade digital: guia para projetos em prefeituras e organizações públicas. São Paulo, SP: Atlas.
Ribeiro, L. M. D. P., Pereira, J. R., & Benedicto, G. C. D. (2013). As reformas da administração pública brasileira: uma contextualização do cenário, entraves e novas perspectivas. In Anais do 34º Encontro da ANPAD, Rio de Janeiro, RJ.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. (2012). Essentials of organizational behavior. Londres, UK: Pearson Education.
Rocha, W. (2008, agosto 18). Card Sorting: uma boa forma de organizar o conteúdo. Sea Tecnologia. Recuperado de http://blog.seatecnologia.com.br/2008/08/18/card-sorting
Rochet, C., & Correa, J. D. (2016). Urban lifecycle management: a research progra for smart government of smart cities. Revista de Gestão e Secretariado, 7(2), 1-20. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v7i2.531
Roethlisberger, F., & Dickson, W. (1941). Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rosenfeld, L., & Morville, P. (2002). Information architecture for the world wide web. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.
Salvador, M., & Ramió, C. (2020). Analytical capacities and data governance in the public administration as a previous stage to the introduction of artificial intelligence. Revista Del Clad Reforma y Democracia, 77, 5-36.
Santos, L. G. M. (2018). Towards the open government ecosystem: open government based on artificial intelligence for the development of public policies. In Proceedings of the 19º Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age, New York, NY.
Schoemaker, P. J., & Day, G. S. (2009). How to make sense of weak signals. In G. R. Hickman (Ed.), Leading Organizations: Perspectives for a New Era (2 ed., Cap. 4, pp. 37-47). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Scholl, H. J., & Scholl, M. C. (2014). Smart governance: a roadmap for research and practice. In Proceedings of the iConference 2014, Berlin, Germany. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.9776/14060
Schaefer, E. D., Macadar, M. A., & Luciano, E. M. (2017). Governança de tecnologia da informação interinstitucional em organizações públicas: reflexões iniciais. In Proceedgins of Conf-IRM - International Conference on Information Resources Management, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Schedler, K. (2018). Von electronic government und smart government: Mehr als elektrifizieren! Recuperado de https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/254154/1/IMPuls-Ausgabe-01-2018_final.pdf
Schedler, K., Guenduez, A. A., & Frischknecht, R. (2019). How smart can government be? Exploring barriers to the adoption of smart government. Information Polity, 24(2), 1-18. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-180095
Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the theory of organization. American Sociological Review, 13(1), 25-35. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.2307/2086752
Selznick, P. (1972). A liderança na administração: uma interpretação sociológica. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Fundação Getulio Vargas.
Shan, S., Duan, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, T. T., & Li, H. (2021). Research on collaborative governance of smart government based on blockchain technology: an evolutionary approach. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2021(Special), 6634386. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6634386
Smith, A. D. (2008). Business and e-government intelligence for strategically everaging information retrieval. Electronic government, an international journal, 5(1), 31-44. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2008.016126
Souza, K. C. (2005). Restructuring government intelligence programs: a few good suggestions. Government Information Quarterly, 22(3), 342-353. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.05.001
Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1999). A institucionalização da teoria institucional. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nordy (Orgs.), Handbook de estudos organizacionais: modelos de análise e novas questões em estudos organizacionais (pp. 196-219). São Paulo, SP: Atlas.
Valle-Cruz, D., & Sandoval-Almazan, R. (2018). Towards an understanding of artificial intelligence in government. In Proceedings of the 19º Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age, New York, NY.
Vidigal, F. (2013). Competitive intelligence: functional practices, goals and infrastructure of companies in Brazil. Transinformação, 25(3), 237-243.
Vieira, D. I., & Alvaro, A. (2018). A centralized platform of open government data as support to applications in the smart cities context. International Journal of Web Information System, 14(2), 2-28. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-05-2017-0045
Xu, M. (2007). Managing strategic intelligence: techniques and technologies. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-243-5
Wang, L. J., Zhang, Y., Li, Q., & Ruan, P. N. (2016). Under the Background of Smart City Development of E-Government Performance Evaluation - Study in Every Districts of Beijing. In Proceedings of the 6º International conference on information technology for manufacturing systems, Prague, Czech Republic.
WeiWei, L., & WeiDong, L. (2015). Advancement on spatial intelligence applications in government. The Open Cybernetics & Systemics Journal, 9(1), 587-593. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.2174/1874110X01509010587
Zucker, L. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42(5), 726-743. 726-43. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.2307/2094862