What is women’s position in Brazil’s board interlocking network? An analysis covering the period from 1997 to 2015

Main Article Content

Thiago de Sousa Barros
Charles Kirschbaum

Abstract

Until very recently, the companies’ boards of directors have shown a strong male predominance, while controversial results regarding the insertion of women
in these bodies have prevailed. Given this, this research aimed to investigate the evolution of women’s participation in the boards of directors of Brazilian
companies listed on B3 and the position of these directors in the corporate board interlock network, between 1997 and 2015. To understand this phenomenon, the Social Network Analysis (SNA) methodology was adopted and several indicators were. The results indicate that women’s participations has increased top management positions of the Brazilian corporate environment and women have begun n to integrate the boards of directors, a scenario still far from the reality observed in developed countries. Nonetheless, by analyzing the corporate network connector , we have concluded that women reach high proximity, since they have a high degree of centrality in the network, but they also lack the potential for intermediation. Such results signal the need to increase gender diversity at the top level of companies, which could raise the quality of debate on boards of directors and improve levels of corporate governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
DE SOUSA BARROS, T.; KIRSCHBAUM, C. What is women’s position in Brazil’s board interlocking network? An analysis covering the period from 1997 to 2015 . RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas , [S. l.], v. 63, n. 1, p. e2021–0410, 2023. DOI: 10.1590/S0034-759020230107. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rae/article/view/88998. Acesso em: 23 apr. 2024.
Section
Articles

References

Alliance for Board Diversity. (2008). Women and minorities on fortune 100 boards. Recuperado de http://theabd.org/Women%20and%20Minorities%20on%20F100%20 Boards_2008.pdf

Barros, T. S., Cárdenas, J., & Mendes-da-Silva, W. (2021). The effect of interlocking directorates on mergers and acquisitions in Brazil. Journal of Management and Governance, 25, 811–839. doi:10.1007/s10997-020-09529-7

Bavelas, A. (1950). Communication patterns in task‐oriented groups. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22(6), 725-730. doi: 10.1121/1.1906679

Benton, R. A., & Cobb, J. A. (2019). Eyes on the horizon? Fragmented elites and the short-term focus of the American corporation. American Journal of Sociology, 124(6), 1631-1684. doi: 10.1086/702916

Bøhren, Ø., & Staubo, S. (2014). Does mandatory gender balance work? Changing organizational form to avoid board upheaval. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 152-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.12.005

Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2(1), 113-120. doi: 10.1080/0022250X.1972.9989806

Borgatti, S. P. (2009). 2-Mode concepts in social network analysis. Encyclopedia of Complexity and System Science, 6, 8279-8291. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3

Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (1997). Network analysis of 2-mode data. Social Networks, 19, 243-269. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00301-2

Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies. Recuperado de https://sites.google.com/site/ucinetsoftware/home

Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2018). Analyzing social networks. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Brookfield, J., Chang, S., Drori, I., Ellis, S., Lazzarini, S., Siegel, J., & Bardina, J. P. von B. (2012). Liberalization, network dynamics, and business groups. In: The Small Worlds of Corporate Governance (pp.77-116). New York: MIT Press.

Burt, R. S. (1998). The gender of social capital. Rationality and Society, 10(1), 5-46. doi: 10.1177/104346398010001001

Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2007). The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(4), 370-379. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa066082

Cirino, J. F. (2018). Discriminação por gênero no mercado de trabalho: Uma comparação do diferencial de rendimento entre homens e mulheres para os anos de 2002 e 2014. Planejamento e Políticas Públicas (PPP) – IPEA, (51), 221-253. Retrieved fromhttps://www.ipea.gov.br/ppp/index.php/PPP/article/view/932

Costa, L., Sampaio, J. O., & Flores, E. S. (2019). Diversidade de gênero nos conselhos administrativos e sua relação com desempenho e risco financeiro nas empresas familiares. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 23(6), 721-738. doi: 10.1590/1982-7849rac2019180327

Dahlander, L., & McFarland, D. A. (2013). Ties that last: Tie formation and persistence in research collaborations over time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(1), 69-110. doi: 10.1177/0001839212474272

Dalton, D. R., & Dalton, C. M. (2009). On the progress of corporate women: Less a glass ceiling than a bottleneck? In Women on corporate boards of directors: International research and practice (pp. 184-197). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Elstad, B., & Ladegard, G. (2012). Women on corporate boards: Key influencers or tokens? Journal of Management & Governance, 16(4), 595-615. doi: 10.1007/s10997-010-9165-y

Ferris, S. P., Jagannathan, M., & Pritchard, A. C. (2003). Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1087-1111. Retrieved fromhttps://www.repository.law.umich.edu/articles/1555

Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40, 3541. doi: 10.2307/3033543

Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in networks: I. Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7

Freeman, L. C., Borgatti, S. P., & White, D. R. (1991). Centrality in valued graphs: A measure of betweenness based on network flow. Social Networks, 13(2), 141-154. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(91)90017-N

Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. Recuperado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392

Gundlach, H. (2015). CC BY-SA 4.0. Analysis. Wikimedia Commons. Recuperado de https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Heemskerk, E. M., & Fennema, M. (2014). Women on bard: Female board membership as a form of elite democratization. Enterprise and Society, 15(2), 252-284. doi: 10.1093/es/kht136

Instituto Brasileiro de Governança Corporativa. (2013). Fundamentos para discussão sobre cotas para mulheres nos conselhos no Brasil. Recuperado de http://www.ibgc.org.br/download/manifestacao/IBGC_Pesquisa_CotasMulheres.pdf

Instituto Brasileiro de Governança Corporativa. (2015). Código das melhores práticas de governança corporativa (5a ed.). São Paulo, SP: IBGC.

Knippen, J. M., Shen, W., & Zhu, Q. (2019). Limited progress? The effect of external pressure for board gender diversity on the increase of female directors. Strategic Management Journal, 40(7), 1123-1150. doi: 10.1002/smj.3014

Knoke, D. (2018). Power networks. In H. Best & J. Higley (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of political elites (pp. 539-561). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Kopoboru, S., Cuevas-Rodríguez, G., & Pérez-Calero, L. (2020). Boards that make a difference in firm’s acquisitions: The role of interlocks and former politicians in Spain. Sustainability, 12(3), 984. doi: 10.3390/su12030984

Kossinets, G., & Watts, D. J. (2009). Origins of homophily in an evolving social network. American Journal of Sociology, 115(2), 405-450. doi: 10.1086/599247

Krackhardt, D. (1990). Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 342-369. doi: 10.2307/2393394

Larcker, D., So, E., & Wang, C. (2013). Boardroom centrality and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(2013), 225-250. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.01.006

Lomi, A., Lusher, D., Pattison, P. E., & Robins, G. (2014). The focused organization of advice relations: A study in boundary crossing. Organization Science, 25(2), 438-457. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2013.0850

Maida, A., & Weber, A. (2019). Female leadership and gender gap within firms: Evidence from an Italian board reform [Discussion Paper n. 12.099]. CEU, WU Vienna, IZA and CEPR. Recuperado de https://docs.iza.org/dp12099.pdf

Masulis, R. W., & Zhang, E. J. (2019). How valuable are independent directors? Evidence from external distractions. Journal of Financial Economics, 132(3), 226-256. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.02.014

Mendes-da-Silva, W., Rossoni, L., Martin, D. L., & Martelanc, R. (2008). The influence of corporate relationships networks on the performance of firms in the Novo Mercado of Bovespa. Brazilian Review of Finance, 6(3), 337-358. doi: 10.12660/rbfin.v6n3.2008.1344

Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico. (2019). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Corporate Governance Factbook. Recuperado de https://www.oecd.org/corporate/corporate-governance-factbook.htm

Podolny, J. M. (1993). A status-based model of market competition. The American Journal of Sociology, 98, 829-872. Recuperado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/2781237

Prudêncio, P., Forte, H., Crisóstomo, V., & Vasconcelos, A. (2021). Effect of diversity in the board of directors and top management team on corporate social responsibility. Brazilian Business Review, 18(1), 1-22. doi: 10.15728/bbr.2021.18.2.1

Sauder, M., Lynn, F., & Podolny, J. M. (2012). Status: Insights from organizational sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 267-283. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145503

Shaw, M. E. (1954). Group structure and the behavior of individuals in small groups. The Journal of Psychology, 38(1),139-149. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1954.9712925