Um modelo latino-americano validado quantitativamente para a deteção de riscos de corrupção em dados abertos em contratos públicos
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
Esta pesquisa apresenta o Modelo Integrado de Risco Latino-Americano (LAIRM), uma estrutura computacional formalmente delineada e reproduzível que visa melhorar a identificação do risco de corrupção nos processos de compras públicas na América Latina. O LAIRM foi criado para abordar as limitações dos benchmarks internacionais atuais. Ele usa uma estrutura matemática robusta baseada em teorias institucionais e de principal-agente para combinar fatores ponderados, como métodos não competitivos, segredos do vendedor e mudanças após a adjudicação. A validação cruzada e os testes de risco com dados abertos do México, Brasil e Colômbia mostraram que o modelo estava correto. A pontuação F1 foi 15% melhor do que a do Red Flags do Banco Mundial, há uma chance de 18% a 25% de detecção precoce. Ao mostrar que o método baseado em evidências pode ser usado tanto para projetos grandes quanto pequenos, este estudo vincula conhecimento profundo com valor. Há planos para o que fazer após o estudo para garantir que o programa seja executado corretamente e os resultados sejam precisos.
Downloads
Detalhes do artigo

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
A RAP compromete-se a contribuir com a proteção dos direitos intelectuais do autor. Nesse sentido:
- Adota a licença CC Attribution 4.0, que permite que os artigos sejam reutilizados e distribuídos sem restrição, desde que o trabalho original seja corretamente citado;
- Assegura os direitos morais e de uso do artigo a autores, conforme CC Attribution 4.0. Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais sob o artigo publicado e o periódico tem o direito de primeira publicação;
- Adota software de verificação de similaridade de conteúdo - plagiarismo (Crossref Similarity Check);
- Recomenda o uso dos critérios de autoria do CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy);
- Adota ações de combate ao plagio e má conduta ética, alinhada às diretrizes do Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE);
- A revista se reserva o direito de efetuar nas originais alterações apenas de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua e a padronização de layout, respeitando, contudo, o estilo dos autores. Posteriormente, os autores receberão as versões finais para aprovação antes da publicação.
Mais detalhes do Código de Ética adotado pela RAP podem ser visualizados em Normas Éticas e Código de Conduta.
Referências
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence, automation, and work. In A. Agrawal, J. Gans & A. Goldfarb (Eds.), The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda (pp. 197-236). University of Chicago Press. http://www.nber.org/books/agra-1
Adam, I., & Fazekas, M. (2021). Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence. Information Economics and Policy, 57, 100950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2021.100950
Agencia Nacional de Contratación Pública Colombia Compra Eficiente. (2025). SECOP II. https://www.colombiacompra.gov.co/secop/secop-ii
Agu, J. C., Nkwo, F. N., & Eneiga, R. U. (2024). Governance and anti-corruption measures in Nigeria: Strategies for enhancing transparency, accountability and public trust. International Journal of Economics and Public Policy, 8(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12576796
Alfian, A., Ritchi, H., & Adrianto, Z. (2023). Fraud analytics practices in public-sector transactions: a systematic review. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 35(5), 685-710. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-11-2022-0175
Alnuaimi, N. T., CHatha, K. A., & Abdallah, S. (2024). Role of big data analytics and information processing capabilities in enhancing transparency and accountability in e-procurement applications. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 23(5), 1729-1750. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-12-2023-0544
Androutsopoulou, M., Askounis, D., Carayannis, E. G., & Zotas, N. (2024). Leveraging AI for enhanced eGovernment: Optimizing the use of open governmental data. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16, 12998-13033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02317-w
Arellano-Gault, D., Rojas-Salazar, G., & Vargas-Pineda, L. R. (2025). Critical theory in public policy and anti-corruption strategies in Latin America: unveiling the limitations (and hypocrisy?) of the dominant anti-corruption discourse. In L. Secchi & C. N. Cruz-Rubio (Eds.), Handbook of Public Policy in Latin America (pp. 356-371). Elgar.
Bahoo, S., Alon, I., & Floreani, J. (2021). Corruption in economics: a bibliometric analysis and research agenda. Applied Economics Letters, 28(7), 565-578. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1764476
Barata, J., & Kayser, I. (2023). Industry 5.0 – Past, Present, and Near Future. Procedia Computer Science, 219, 778-788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.351
Borsboom, D., Deserno, M. K., Rhemtulla, M., Epskamp, S., Fried, E. I., McNally, R. J., Robinaugh, D. J., Perugini, M., Dalege, J., Costantini, G., Isvoranu, A.-M., Wysocki, A. C., Borkulo, C. D. van, Bork, R. van, & Waldorp, L. J. (2021). Network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-021-00055-w
Breuer, M., Labro, E., Sapra, H., & Zakolyukina, A. A. (2024). Bridging theory and empirical research in accounting. Journal of Accounting Research, 62(3), 1121-1139. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12545
Brückner, A., Wölke, M., Hein-Pensel, F., Schero, E., Winkler, H., & Jabs, I. (2025). Assessing industry 5.0 readiness—Prototype of a holistic digital index to evaluate sustainability, resilience and human-centered factors. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 5(1), 100329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2025.100329
Chen, C., & Ganapati, S. (2023). Do transparency mechanisms reduce government corruption? A meta-analysis. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(1), 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211033236
Chystiakova, A., Podliehaiev, K., Khoronovskyi, O., Sokur, T., & Kubariev, I. (2025). The role of big data analytics in the investigation of corruption offences. Revista Jurídica Portucalense, 116-143. https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(37)2025.ic-6
Controladoria Geral da União. (2025). Portal da Transparência. https://portaldatransparencia.gov.br/
Davis, D. B., Mendoza, R. U., & Yap, J. K. (2024). Corruption risk and political dynasties: exploring the links using public procurement data in the Philippines. Economics of Governance, 25(1), 81-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-023-00306-4
Dessureault, J.-S., Lamontagne, R., & Parisé, P.-O. (2025). The ethics of creating artificial superintelligence: a global risk perspective. AI and Ethics, 5, 6241-6263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00793-7
Didier, N. (2025). Decolonizing Public Administration in Latin America: A systematic literature review of trending discussions in the region. Public Administration and Development, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2092
Fazekas, M., & Kocsis, G. (2020). Uncovering High-Level Corruption: Cross-National Objective Corruption Risk Indicators Using Public Procurement Data. British journal of political science, 50(1), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000461
Genest, Y. (2025). The evolution of internal audit in anti-corruption activities: leveraging data analytics and it technology. EDPACS, 70(4), 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366981.2025.2453271
Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Mubarak, M. F., Mubarik, M., Rejeb, A., & Nilashi, M. (2022). Identifying industry 5.0 contributions to sustainable development: A strategy roadmap for delivering sustainability values. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 33, 716-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.08.003
Gobierno de México. (2025). Compras MX. https://comprasmx.buengobierno.gob.mx/
Gutiérrez-Romero, R., & Iturbe, N. (2024). Causes and electoral consequences of political assassinations: The role of organized crime in Mexico. Political Geography, 115, 103206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103206
Horochovski, R. R., Mancuso, W. P., & Pereira, T. F. (2024). A produção acadêmica sobre o Caso Lava Jato. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 32, e021. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-98732432e021
Kaswan, M. S., Chaudhary, R., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Singh, A. (2024). A review of Industry 5.0: from key facets to a conceptual implementation framework. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 42(4), 1196-1223. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-01-2024-0030
Kenny, C., & Musatova, M. (2010). Red flags of corruption in World Bank projects: An analysis of infrastructure contracts. In S. Rose-Ackerman & T. Søreide (Eds.), International handbook on the economics of corruption (Vol. 2, pp. 299-335). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5243
Kirby, N. (2021). An ‘institution-first’conception of public integrity. British journal of political science, 51(4), 1620-1635. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712342000006X
Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling corruption. University of California Press.
Kour, R., Karim, R., Dersin, P., & Venkatesh, N. (2024). Cybersecurity for Industry 5.0: trends and gaps. Frontiers in Computer Science, 6, 1434436. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2024.1434436
León, A. J. A. V. (2012). Revisión de las reformas a la Ley de Adquisiciones, Arrendamientos y Servicios del Sector Público del 28 de mayo de 2009, en materia de licitaciones públicas [Undergraduate thesis, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas]. Repositorio Digital CIDE. http://hdl.handle.net/11651/4829
Linhartova, V., & Pucek, M. J. (2024). Corruption and Human Development: Panel Data Analysis in Transition Economies. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 20(2), 169-182. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2024.20-2.14
Luthra, A., Dixit, S., Garg, S., Singh, A., & Anchal, M. (2025). Addressing Ethical Considerations and Responsible AI Practices. In A. Behl, C. Krishnan, P. Malik & S. Gautam (Eds.), The ChatGPT Revolution: How Conversational AI is Transforming Customer Service and Business Operations (pp. 129-149). https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83549-852-120251007
Madhala, R. T. (2025). Driving Digital Transformation in Insurance: The Role of System Integration and Guidewire Expertise. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology, 91-100. https://doi.org/10.56472/ICCSAIML25-111
Meyer, K. Z., Luiz, J. M., & Fedderke, J. W. (2025). Corruption dynamics: Integrating structure, agency and institutional logics across contexts. International Journal of Management Reviews, 28(1), e12403. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12403
Mittal, P. (2020). Big data and analytics: a data management perspective in public administration. International Journal of Big Data Management, 1(2), 152-165. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBDM.2020.112415
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
North, D. C. (2025). Institutions and the Performance of Economies Over Time. In C. Ménard & M. M. Shirley (Eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics (pp. 25-35). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50810-3_2
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Government at a Glance 2019. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/government-at-a-glance-2019_8ccf5c38-en.html
Rabuzin, K., & Modrusan, N. (2019, September). Prediction of Public Procurement Corruption Indices using Machine Learning Methods. Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Vienna, Austria. https://doi.org/10.5220/0008353603330340
Rajala, T., & Jalonen, H. (2025). Beyond Simplification in Public Sector Accountability: Contradictions Between Principal‐Agent and Complexity Theories. Public Administration Review, 85(6), 1757-1770. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13941
Rojas, V. C. J. (2022). Responsabilidad precontractual del estado: imprecisiones en el sistema de subsanabilidad en Colombia a partir del SECOP II. [Undergraduate thesis]. Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge University Press.
Smidt, H., Mitchell, N. J., & Bakke, K. M. (2025). A red flag for public goods? The correlates of civil society restrictions. Governance, 38(2), e12894. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12894
Souza, P. V. N. C. S., Ramos, T. M., & Silva, L. G. (2021). Inclinações pragmáticas na nova Lei de Licitações e Contratos Administrativos (Lei nº 14.133/2021): novos princípios, velhos problemas. Revista de Direito Brasileira, 29(11), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2021.v29i11.7514
Storey, V. C., Baskerville, R. L., & Kaul, M. (2025). Reliability in design science research. Information Systems Journal, 35(3), 984-1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12564
Trequattrini, R., Palmaccio, M., Turco, M., & Manzari, A. (2024). The contribution of blockchain technologies to anti‐corruption practices: A systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(1), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3327
Velásquez, A. G., & Díez, C. A. D. (2019). El contrato de prestación de servicios en el estatuto general de contratación de la administración pública: un tipo contractual de compleja celebración. Vniversitas, 68(139), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.vj139.cpse
Wachs, J., & Kertész, J. (2019). A network approach to cartel detection in public auction markets. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 10818. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47198-1
Wahab, S., Imran, M., Ahmed, B., Rahim, S., & Hassan, T. (2024). Navigating environmental concerns: Unveiling the role of economic growth, trade, resources and institutional quality on greenhouse gas emissions in OECD countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 139851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139851
Yatsyna, Y., & Kudinov, I. (2023). Innovative analytical and statistical technology as a corruption counteraction tool: conceptual analysis. Amazonia Investiga, 12(67), 78-86. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.67.07.7