A quantitatively validated Latin American model for corruption risk detection in public procurement open data

Main Article Content

Gabriel Silva
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4881-181X

Abstract

This research presents the Latin American Integrated Risk Model (LAIRM), a formally delineated and reproducible computational framework aimed at improving the identification of corruption risks in public procurement processes across Latin America. The LAIRM was developed to address the limitations of current international benchmarks. It employs a robust mathematical structure grounded in institutional and principal-agent theories to combine weighted factors, such as non-competitive bidding, vendor opacity, and post-award modifications. Cross-validation and risk testing using open data from Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia validated the model’s efficacy. The results showed an F1-score 15% higher than the World Bank’s Red Flags framework, with an 18% to 25% increase in early detection probability. By demonstrating that this evidence-based method is applicable to both large and small-scale projects, this study bridges theoretical depth with practical value. Future work is outlined to ensure proper systemic implementation and continuous accuracy of the results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Silva, G. (2026). A quantitatively validated Latin American model for corruption risk detection in public procurement open data. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 60, e2025–0356. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220250356x
Section
Article

References

Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence, automation, and work. In A. Agrawal, J. Gans & A. Goldfarb (Eds.), The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda (pp. 197-236). University of Chicago Press. http://www.nber.org/books/agra-1

Adam, I., & Fazekas, M. (2021). Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence. Information Economics and Policy, 57, 100950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2021.100950

Agencia Nacional de Contratación Pública Colombia Compra Eficiente. (2025). SECOP II. https://www.colombiacompra.gov.co/secop/secop-ii

Agu, J. C., Nkwo, F. N., & Eneiga, R. U. (2024). Governance and anti-corruption measures in Nigeria: Strategies for enhancing transparency, accountability and public trust. International Journal of Economics and Public Policy, 8(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12576796

Alfian, A., Ritchi, H., & Adrianto, Z. (2023). Fraud analytics practices in public-sector transactions: a systematic review. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 35(5), 685-710. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-11-2022-0175

Alnuaimi, N. T., CHatha, K. A., & Abdallah, S. (2024). Role of big data analytics and information processing capabilities in enhancing transparency and accountability in e-procurement applications. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 23(5), 1729-1750. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-12-2023-0544

Androutsopoulou, M., Askounis, D., Carayannis, E. G., & Zotas, N. (2024). Leveraging AI for enhanced eGovernment: Optimizing the use of open governmental data. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16, 12998-13033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02317-w

Arellano-Gault, D., Rojas-Salazar, G., & Vargas-Pineda, L. R. (2025). Critical theory in public policy and anti-corruption strategies in Latin America: unveiling the limitations (and hypocrisy?) of the dominant anti-corruption discourse. In L. Secchi & C. N. Cruz-Rubio (Eds.), Handbook of Public Policy in Latin America (pp. 356-371). Elgar.

Bahoo, S., Alon, I., & Floreani, J. (2021). Corruption in economics: a bibliometric analysis and research agenda. Applied Economics Letters, 28(7), 565-578. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1764476

Barata, J., & Kayser, I. (2023). Industry 5.0 – Past, Present, and Near Future. Procedia Computer Science, 219, 778-788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.351

Borsboom, D., Deserno, M. K., Rhemtulla, M., Epskamp, S., Fried, E. I., McNally, R. J., Robinaugh, D. J., Perugini, M., Dalege, J., Costantini, G., Isvoranu, A.-M., Wysocki, A. C., Borkulo, C. D. van, Bork, R. van, & Waldorp, L. J. (2021). Network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-021-00055-w

Breuer, M., Labro, E., Sapra, H., & Zakolyukina, A. A. (2024). Bridging theory and empirical research in accounting. Journal of Accounting Research, 62(3), 1121-1139. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12545

Brückner, A., Wölke, M., Hein-Pensel, F., Schero, E., Winkler, H., & Jabs, I. (2025). Assessing industry 5.0 readiness—Prototype of a holistic digital index to evaluate sustainability, resilience and human-centered factors. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 5(1), 100329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2025.100329

Chen, C., & Ganapati, S. (2023). Do transparency mechanisms reduce government corruption? A meta-analysis. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(1), 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211033236

Chystiakova, A., Podliehaiev, K., Khoronovskyi, O., Sokur, T., & Kubariev, I. (2025). The role of big data analytics in the investigation of corruption offences. Revista Jurídica Portucalense, 116-143. https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(37)2025.ic-6

Controladoria Geral da União. (2025). Portal da Transparência. https://portaldatransparencia.gov.br/

Davis, D. B., Mendoza, R. U., & Yap, J. K. (2024). Corruption risk and political dynasties: exploring the links using public procurement data in the Philippines. Economics of Governance, 25(1), 81-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-023-00306-4

Dessureault, J.-S., Lamontagne, R., & Parisé, P.-O. (2025). The ethics of creating artificial superintelligence: a global risk perspective. AI and Ethics, 5, 6241-6263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00793-7

Didier, N. (2025). Decolonizing Public Administration in Latin America: A systematic literature review of trending discussions in the region. Public Administration and Development, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2092

Fazekas, M., & Kocsis, G. (2020). Uncovering High-Level Corruption: Cross-National Objective Corruption Risk Indicators Using Public Procurement Data. British journal of political science, 50(1), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000461

Genest, Y. (2025). The evolution of internal audit in anti-corruption activities: leveraging data analytics and it technology. EDPACS, 70(4), 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366981.2025.2453271

Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Mubarak, M. F., Mubarik, M., Rejeb, A., & Nilashi, M. (2022). Identifying industry 5.0 contributions to sustainable development: A strategy roadmap for delivering sustainability values. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 33, 716-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.08.003

Gobierno de México. (2025). Compras MX. https://comprasmx.buengobierno.gob.mx/

Gutiérrez-Romero, R., & Iturbe, N. (2024). Causes and electoral consequences of political assassinations: The role of organized crime in Mexico. Political Geography, 115, 103206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103206

Horochovski, R. R., Mancuso, W. P., & Pereira, T. F. (2024). A produção acadêmica sobre o Caso Lava Jato. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 32, e021. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-98732432e021

Kaswan, M. S., Chaudhary, R., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Singh, A. (2024). A review of Industry 5.0: from key facets to a conceptual implementation framework. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 42(4), 1196-1223. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-01-2024-0030

Kenny, C., & Musatova, M. (2010). Red flags of corruption in World Bank projects: An analysis of infrastructure contracts. In S. Rose-Ackerman & T. Søreide (Eds.), International handbook on the economics of corruption (Vol. 2, pp. 299-335). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5243

Kirby, N. (2021). An ‘institution-first’conception of public integrity. British journal of political science, 51(4), 1620-1635. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712342000006X

Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling corruption. University of California Press.

Kour, R., Karim, R., Dersin, P., & Venkatesh, N. (2024). Cybersecurity for Industry 5.0: trends and gaps. Frontiers in Computer Science, 6, 1434436. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2024.1434436

León, A. J. A. V. (2012). Revisión de las reformas a la Ley de Adquisiciones, Arrendamientos y Servicios del Sector Público del 28 de mayo de 2009, en materia de licitaciones públicas [Undergraduate thesis, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas]. Repositorio Digital CIDE. http://hdl.handle.net/11651/4829

Linhartova, V., & Pucek, M. J. (2024). Corruption and Human Development: Panel Data Analysis in Transition Economies. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 20(2), 169-182. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2024.20-2.14

Luthra, A., Dixit, S., Garg, S., Singh, A., & Anchal, M. (2025). Addressing Ethical Considerations and Responsible AI Practices. In A. Behl, C. Krishnan, P. Malik & S. Gautam (Eds.), The ChatGPT Revolution: How Conversational AI is Transforming Customer Service and Business Operations (pp. 129-149). https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83549-852-120251007

Madhala, R. T. (2025). Driving Digital Transformation in Insurance: The Role of System Integration and Guidewire Expertise. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology, 91-100. https://doi.org/10.56472/ICCSAIML25-111

Meyer, K. Z., Luiz, J. M., & Fedderke, J. W. (2025). Corruption dynamics: Integrating structure, agency and institutional logics across contexts. International Journal of Management Reviews, 28(1), e12403. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12403

Mittal, P. (2020). Big data and analytics: a data management perspective in public administration. International Journal of Big Data Management, 1(2), 152-165. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBDM.2020.112415

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.

North, D. C. (2025). Institutions and the Performance of Economies Over Time. In C. Ménard & M. M. Shirley (Eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics (pp. 25-35). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50810-3_2

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Government at a Glance 2019. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/government-at-a-glance-2019_8ccf5c38-en.html

Rabuzin, K., & Modrusan, N. (2019, September). Prediction of Public Procurement Corruption Indices using Machine Learning Methods. Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Vienna, Austria. https://doi.org/10.5220/0008353603330340

Rajala, T., & Jalonen, H. (2025). Beyond Simplification in Public Sector Accountability: Contradictions Between Principal‐Agent and Complexity Theories. Public Administration Review, 85(6), 1757-1770. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13941

Rojas, V. C. J. (2022). Responsabilidad precontractual del estado: imprecisiones en el sistema de subsanabilidad en Colombia a partir del SECOP II. [Undergraduate thesis]. Universidad Externado de Colombia.

Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge University Press.

Smidt, H., Mitchell, N. J., & Bakke, K. M. (2025). A red flag for public goods? The correlates of civil society restrictions. Governance, 38(2), e12894. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12894

Souza, P. V. N. C. S., Ramos, T. M., & Silva, L. G. (2021). Inclinações pragmáticas na nova Lei de Licitações e Contratos Administrativos (Lei nº 14.133/2021): novos princípios, velhos problemas. Revista de Direito Brasileira, 29(11), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2021.v29i11.7514

Storey, V. C., Baskerville, R. L., & Kaul, M. (2025). Reliability in design science research. Information Systems Journal, 35(3), 984-1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12564

Trequattrini, R., Palmaccio, M., Turco, M., & Manzari, A. (2024). The contribution of blockchain technologies to anti‐corruption practices: A systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(1), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3327

Velásquez, A. G., & Díez, C. A. D. (2019). El contrato de prestación de servicios en el estatuto general de contratación de la administración pública: un tipo contractual de compleja celebración. Vniversitas, 68(139), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.vj139.cpse

Wachs, J., & Kertész, J. (2019). A network approach to cartel detection in public auction markets. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 10818. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47198-1

Wahab, S., Imran, M., Ahmed, B., Rahim, S., & Hassan, T. (2024). Navigating environmental concerns: Unveiling the role of economic growth, trade, resources and institutional quality on greenhouse gas emissions in OECD countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 139851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139851

Yatsyna, Y., & Kudinov, I. (2023). Innovative analytical and statistical technology as a corruption counteraction tool: conceptual analysis. Amazonia Investiga, 12(67), 78-86. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.67.07.7