The role of intergovernmental relations in response to a wicked problem: an analysis of the COVID-19 crisis in the BRICS countries

Main Article Content

Jose A. Puppim de Oliveira
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5000-6265
Alexey G. Barabashev
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4746-7532
Christopher Tapscott
Lisa Ingrid Thompson
Haoqi Qian
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5156-4402

Abstract

Globally, policy environments have become increasingly more complex with the growth in the number of wicked problems, such as that posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. In their response to these problems, public administrations have, from necessity, become heavily reliant on their intergovernmental relations systems, as the challenges posed generally require multilevel responses. This paper analyzes the role of intergovernmental relations in shaping the responses of the BRICS countries when confronted with COVID-19. We develop an analytical framework to understand the dynamics of intergovernmental relations in these countries. Based on this we assess the capacity of the state and political systems to manage intergovernmental relations and ensure effective responses to the COVID-19 crisis. This framework is based on an analysis of three dimensions of the policy domain: the political and state system, formal and informal institutions, and the political alignment between them. Whilst state and political systems were found to be instrumental in formulating an immediate response to the crisis, informal institutions and political processes also played a prominent role in determining the extent to which strategies were implemented, particularly in countries that are more decentralized. Countries lacking the robust formal institutions needed to facilitate intergovernmental relations and to ensure swift policy responses, tend to deliver ineffective and inefficient results when confronted with wicked problems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Oliveira, J. A. P. de, Barabashev, A. G., Tapscott, C., Thompson, L. I., & Qian, H. (2021). The role of intergovernmental relations in response to a wicked problem: an analysis of the COVID-19 crisis in the BRICS countries. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 55(1), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220200501
Section
Comparative analysis of COVID-19: political leadership, context, policy response

References

Adam, I., & Hepburn, E. (2019). Intergovernmental relations on immigrant integration in multi-level states. A comparative assessment.Regional & Federal Studies,29(5), 563-589.

Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar. (2018). Medicina Intensiva no Brasil. Brasília, DF: Author.

Agranoff, R. (2004). JPART symposium introduction: Researching intergovernmental relations.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(4), 443-446.

Agranoff, R. (2011). Federalist No. 44: What Is the Role of Intergovernmental Relations in Federalism? Public Administration Review, 71, s68-s77.

Arundel, A. (2017). Rethinking the effect of risk aversion on the benefits of service innovations in public administration agencies.Research Policy,46(5), 900-910.

Balme, R., & Qi Y. (2014). Multi‐Level Governance and the Environment: Intergovernmental Relations and Innovation in Environmental Policy. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(3), 147-154.

Barabashev, A. G., & Klimenko, A. V. (2017). Russian governance changes and performance.Chinese Political Science Review, 2(1), 22-39.

Cai, H., & Treisman, D. (2006). Did government decentralization cause China’s economic miracle? World Politics, 58(4): 505-535.

Conlan, T. (2017). Intergovernmental relations in a compound republic: The journey from cooperative to polarized federalism.Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 47(2), 171-187.

Couto, C. G., & Absher-Bellon, G. L. (2018). Imitação ou coerção? Constituições estaduais e centralização federativa no Brasil.Revista de Administração Pública,52(2), 321-344.

Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (2000). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know Boston, Chicago: Harvard Business School Press.

Elazar, D. J. (1987).Exploring federalism Tuscaloosa, Alabama: University of Alabama Press.

Fenna, A. (2012). Federalism and Intergovernmental Coordination. In B. Guy Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Public Administration (pp. 750-763). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

Fiszbein, A. (1997). The emergence of local capacity: Lessons from Colombia. World Development, 25(7), 1029-1043.

Fry, G. K. (1999). More than ‘counting manhole covers’: the evolution of the British tradition of public administration.Public Administration,77(3), 527-540.

Happaerts, S., Schunz, S., & Bruyninckx, H. (2012). Federalism and intergovernmental relations: The multi-level politics of climate change policy in Belgium.Journal of Contemporary European Studies,20(4), 441-458.

Hegele, Y. (2018). Explaining bureaucratic power in intergovernmental relations: A network approach.Public Administration,96(4), 753-768.

Heymann, D. L., & Shindo, N. (2020). COVID-19: what is next for public health?The Lancet,395(10224), 542-545.

International Monetary Fund. (2019). World Economic Outlook Database Washington, DC: Author.

International Monetary Fund. (2020). IMF and COVID-19. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/imf-and-covid19/Policy-Responses-to-COVID-19#B

Jalal, A. (1995).Democracy and authoritarianism in South Asia: A comparative and historical perspective Vol. 1). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Jing, Y. (2017). Creative incrementalism: Governance reforms in China since 1978.Chinese Political Science Review, 2(1), 56-68.

Kincaid, J., & Stenberg, C. W. (2011). “Big Questions” about Intergovernmental Relations and Management: Who Will Address Them? Public Administration Review 71(2), 196-202.

Kummitha, R. K. R. (2020, July). Smart technologies for fighting pandemics: the techno- and human- driven approaches in controlling the virus transmission. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101481. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101481

Mathur, K., & Mathur, N. (2017). Assessing Administrative Reform in India.Chinese Political Science Review, 2(1), 40-55.

McGuire, M., & Silvia, C. (2010). The effect of problem severity, managerial and organizational capacity, and agency structure on intergovernmental collaboration: Evidence from local emergency management.Public Administration Review, 70(2), 279-288.

Mello, L., & Jalles, J. T. (2019). The global crisis and intergovernmental relations: centralization versus decentralization 10 years on.Regional Studies, 54(7), 1-16.

Nice, D. C. (1987). Federalism: The politics of intergovernmental relations New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

O’Toole, L. J. Jr., & Christensen, R. K. (2012). American intergovernmental relations: Foundations, perspectives, and issues Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.

O’Toole, L. J., Jr., & Meier, K. J. (2004). Public management in intergovernmental networks: Matching structural networks and managerial networking. Journal of public administration research and theory,14(4), 469-494.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). Coronavirus Policy Response. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/en/#policy-responses

Our World in Data. (2020). Website. Retrieved from http://ourworldindate.org

Ouverney, A. M., & Fleury, S. (2017). Polarização federativa do SUS nos anos 1990: uma interpretação histórico-institucionalista.Revista de Administração Pública,51(6), 1085-1103.

Paquet, M., & Schertzer, R. (2020). COVID-19 as a Complex Intergovernmental Problem.Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 53, 343-347.

Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2001). Developments in intergovernmental relations: towards multi-level governance. Policy and Politics, 29(2), 131-136.

Phillimore, J. (2013). Understanding intergovernmental relations: Key features and trends.Australian Journal of Public Administration, 72(3), 228-238.

Pierre, J. (1999). Models of urban governance: The institutional dimension of urban politics.Urban Affairs Review,34(3), 372-396.

Puppim de Oliveira, J. A. (2017). Brazilian public administration: shaping and being shaped by governance and development.Chinese Political Science Review, 2(1), 7-21.

Puppim de Oliveira, J. A. (2019). Intergovernmental relations for environmental governance: Cases of solid waste management and climate change in two Malaysian States.Journal of Environmental Management,233, 481-488.

Rhodes, R. A. W. (2018).Control and power in central-local government relations London, UK: Routledge.

Schneider, S. (2008). Who’s to Blame? (Mis) perceptions of the Intergovernmental Response to Disasters. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 38(4), 715-738.

Souza, C. (1997). Constitutional engineering in Brazil: the politics of federalism and decentralization New York, NY: St. Martin’s.

Stratton, R. M. (1989). Disaster relief: the politics of intergovernmental relations Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America.

Tang, S. Y., & An, B. (2020). Comparing Emergency Responses to COVID-19: A Governance and Intergovernmental Perspective.Available at SSRN 3602172

Tapscott, C. (2017). South Africa in the twenty-first century: governance challenges in the struggle for social equity and economic growth.Chinese Political Science Review, 2(1), 69-84.

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2019). World Population Prospects 2019. Retrieved from https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Standard/Population/

World Health Organization. (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation report, 51. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200311-sitrep-51-covid-19.pdf

Wright, D. S. (1990). Federalism, intergovernmental relations, and intergovernmental management: Historical reflections and conceptual comparisons. Public Administration Review, 50(2), 168-178.