Tying the successor’s hands or following the neighbor? Diffusion of access to information in Brazilian municipalities
Main Article Content
Abstract
Why do political actors promote public transparency? Studies show that adherence to transparency can be both politically strategic, i.e., to tie the hands of the successor, and a result of observing the adoption of the policy made by other municipalities, i.e., to minimize the cost of information. We test both the political and the informational motivations to explain the adoption of transparency laws with a subnational analysis of the diffusion of LAI in Brazilian municipalities (2011-2019). Results show that both the informational and the political strategy motivations affect the probability of adopting the LAI. Socioeconomic factors are also important explanatory factors. However, an analysis of heterogeneous effects shows that the learning mechanism is relevant for reducing the impact of socioeconomic factors. This means that learning from neighboring municipalities minimizes the cost of information and the reliance on structural factors to promote transparency at the local level.
Downloads
Article Details
The Brazilian Journal of Public Administration (RAP) undertakes to contribute to the protection of authors’ intellectual rights. On this matter:
- It uses the Creative Commons BY (CC-BY) license for all texts it publishes, except when there is indication of specific holders of copyrights and property rights;
- It uses the similarity verification software of content - Plagiarism (Crossref Similarity Check);
- It takes actions to fight against plagiarism and ethical misconduct aligned with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Further information on the Code of Ethics adopted by RAP can be found in Ethical Standards and Code of Conduct.
References
Alves, J. F., Miranda, A. R. A., Teixeira, M. A. C., & Souza, P. R. R. (2021). Ranking de transparência ativa de municípios do Estado de Minas Gerais: avaliação à luz da Lei de Acesso à Informação. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 19(3), 564-581. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120200135
Batista, M. (2015). Burocracia local e qualidade da implementação de políticas descentralizadas: uma análise da gestão de recursos federais pelos municípios brasileiros. Revista do Serviço Público, 66(3), 345-370. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.21874/rsp.v66i3.571
Batista, M. (2017). A Difusão da Lei de Acesso à Informação nos Municípios Brasileiros: Fatores Internos e Externos (Cadernos Enap, 53). Brasília, DF: Escola Nacional de Administração Pública. Recuperado de https://repositorio.enap.gov.br/bitstream/1/3125/1/Cadernos_53.pdf
Bentham, J. (1995). The panopticon writings. London, UK: Verso.
Berliner, D. (2014). The Political Origins of Transparency. Journal of Politics, 76(2), 479- 491. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381613001412
Berliner, D., & Aaron E. (2015). Competing for Transparency: Political Competition and Institutional Reform in Mexican States. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 110-128. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000616
Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. (1990). State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 395-415. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.2307/1963526
Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. (2007). Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of The Policy Process. Cambridge, UK: Westview Press.
Bolognesi, B., Ribeiro, E., & Codato, A. (2021, junho 30). A new ideological classification of the Brazilian political parties. SciELO Preprints. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.2552
Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., & Jones B. S. (2004). Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Coêlho, D. B. (2012). Political Competition and the Diffusion of Conditional Cash Transfers in Brazil. Brazilian Political Science Review, 6(2), 56-87.
Ferejohn, J. (1986). Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control. Public Choice, 50(1/3), 5-25.
Fox, J. A. (2007). The Uncertain Relationship between Transparency and Accountability. Development in Practice, 17(4/5), 663-671. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469955
Gilardi, F. (2010, julho). Who Learns What in Policy Diffusion Process? American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 650-666. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00452.x
Gilardi, F., & Wasserfallen, F. (2019, novembro). The Politics of Policy Diffusion. European Journal of Political Research, 58(4), 1245-1256. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12326
Graham, E. R., Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2013). The Diffusion of Policy Diffusion Research in Political Science. British Journal of Political Science, 43(3), 673-701. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000415
Gray, V. (1973). Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study. The American Political Science Review, 67(4), 1174-1185. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.2307/1956539
Kosack, S., & Fung, A. (2014, maio). Does Transparency Improve Governance? Annual Review of Political Science, 17, 65-87. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032210-144356
Lei nº 12.527, de 18 de novembro de 2011. (2011). Regula o acesso a informações previsto no inciso XXXIII do art. 5º, no inciso II do § 3º do art. 37 e no § 2º do art. 216 da Constituição Federal; altera a Lei nº 8.112, de 11 de dezembro de 1990; revoga a Lei nº 11.111, de 5 de maio de 2005, e dispositivos da Lei nº 8.159, de 8 de janeiro de 1991; e dá outras providências. Brasília, DF. Recuperado de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2011/lei/l12527.htm
Meijer, A. (2013). Understanding the Complex Dynamics of Transparency. Public Administration Review, 73(3), 429-439. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12032
Meijer, A. (2015). Government Transparency in Historical Perspective: From the Ancient Regime to Open Data in the Netherlands. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(3), 189-199. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.934837
Michener, G. (2011, abril). FOI laws around the world. Journal of Democracy, 22(2), 145- 159. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2011.0021
Michener, G. (2015a). Assessing Freedom of Information in Latin America a Decade Later: Illuminating a Transparency Causal Mechanism. Latin American Politics and Society, 57(3), 77-99. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2015.00275.x
Michener, G. (2015b, janeiro). How Cabinet Size and Legislative Control Shape the Strength of Transparency Laws. Governance, 28(1), 77-94. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12075
Michener, G. (2015c, outubro). Policy evaluation via composite indexes: Qualitative lessons from international transparency policy indexes. World Development, 74, 184-196. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.04.016
Michener, G., Contreras, E., & Niskier, I. (2018). From Opacity to Transparency? Evaluating Access to Information in Brazil Five Years Later. Revista de Administração Pública, 52(4), 610-629. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220170289
Michener, G., & Nichter, S. (2022, janeiro). Local compliance with national transparency legislation. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101659. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101659
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Shipan, C. R, & Volden, C. (2008). The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 840-857.
Stiglitz, J. E. (1999, janeiro 27). On Liberty, the Right to Know, and Public Discourse: The Role of Transparency in Public Life. Oxford, UK: Oxford Amnesty Lecture.
Sugiyama, N. B. (2008). Theories of Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies, 41(2), 193-216. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414007300916
Walker, J. L. (1969, setembro). The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States. The American Political Science Review, 63(3), 880-899. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.2307/1954434