Participative budgetary practices: a case study of three municipalities in the state of São Paulo
Main Article Content
Abstract
Budget preparation through citizen participation is a novelty in Brazil. This article analyses three cities that first attempted to implement citizen participation in Brazil namely São Paulo, Santos and Jaboticabal. Those cities differ as to several parameters such as population, revenue, per capita income and 50 on, which makes the implementation process specific for each one. Sections 2 and 3 characterize the cities and their way of implementing citizen participation in budget preparation. Nevertheless, the lack of concern with effectiveness of the measures taken and with the creation of institutional ways of involving citizens in budget preparation makes evaluation of the experiences problematic. In section 4 criteria to evaluate citizen participation are developed. A discussion on how to use these criteria in Brazilian cities follows. Section 5 presents the experience of a few American cities, the state of Minne50ta (USA) and Yokohama (Japan). These experiences are quite different from what is currently being done in Brazil and offer new options of citizen participation. The conclusion points out the needs for institutionalizing the process of citizen participation and assessing it in a formal and periodic manner, as means of making the process more effective.
Downloads
Article Details
RAP is committed to contributing to the protection of the author's intellectual rights. In this regard, it:
- Adopts the Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, provided that the original work is properly cited;
- Ensures moral and usage rights of the article to authors, in accordance with Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0. Authors retain the copyright to the published article, and the journal holds the right of first publication;
- Utilizes content similarity/plagiarism detection software (Crossref Similarity Check);
- Recommends the use of CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) authorship criteria;
- Adopts actions to combat plagiarism and ethical misconduct, aligned with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines;
- Reserves the right to make changes to the original versions regarding normative, spelling, and grammatical standards to maintain high linguistic quality and layout standardization, while respecting the authors' style. Subsequently, authors will receive the final versions for approval prior to publication.
Further information on the Code of Ethics adopted by RAP can be found in Ethical Standards and Code of Conduct.