Partisan alignment and public policies provision in Brazil

Main Article Content

Evertton Lira
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5605-322X

Abstract

This research examines whether local governments politically aligned with the president’s party offer more public policies. The delivery of public services is one of the central activities of governments. Since the political parties control the executive branch in both federal and local government, it is reasonable to expect that their partisan and electoral interests will influence policy implementation. This study analyzes the coverage of primary healthcare as an indicator of policy delivery. Given the strong sharing of responsibilities among federated entities, I argue that the federal government implements public policies strategically, increasing the supply of services in partisan-aligned municipalities. To empirically test this relationship, I estimate the causal effect of alignment using a regression-discontinuity design for close elections. The results indicate that partisan-aligned municipalities have, on average, 3% higher coverage of primary healthcare than others governed by opposition parties. In a city with 10,000 inhabitants, for example, this would mean 300 more people receiving healthcare.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Lira, E. (2023). Partisan alignment and public policies provision in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 57(1), e2022–0135. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220220135
Section
Article

References

Abrucio, F. L. (2005). A coordenação federativa no Brasil: a experiência do período FHC e os desafios do governo Lula. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 24, 41-67. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-44782005000100005

Allan, J. P., & Scruggs, L. (2004). Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies. American Journal of Political Science, 48(3), 496-512. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00083.x

Almeida, M. H. T. (2005). Recentralizando a federação? Revista de Sociologia e Política, 24, 29-40. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-44782005000100004

Alvarez, R. M., Garrett, G., & Lange, P. (1993). Government partisanship, labor organization, and macroeconomic performance. American Political Science Review, 85(2), 539-556. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.2307/2938825

Arretche, M. (2001). Uma contribuição para fazermos avaliações menos ingênuas. In M. C. R. N. Barreira, & M. C. B. Carvalho (Eds.), Tendências e perspectivas na avaliação de políticas e programas sociais (p. 43-56). São Paulo, SP: IEE/PUC-SP.

Arretche, M. (2002a). Federalismo e relações intergovernamentais no Brasil: a reforma de programas sociais. Dados, 45(3), 431-458. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582002000300004

Arretche, M. (2002b). Relações federativas nas políticas sociais. Educação & Sociedade, 23(80), 25-48. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/s0101-73302002008000003

Arretche, M. (2004). Federalismo e políticas sociais no Brasil: problemas de coordenação e autonomia. São Paulo em Perspectiva, 18(2), 17-26. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-88392004000200003

Arretche, M. (2009). Continuidades e descontinuidades da Federação Brasileira: de como 1988 facilitou 1995. Dados, 52(2), 377-423. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582009000200004

Arretche, M. (2010). Federalismo e igualdade territorial: uma contradição em termos? Dados, 53(3), 587-620. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582010000300003

Arulampalam, W., Dasgupta, S., Dhillon, A., & Dutta, B. (2009). Electoral goals and center-state transfers: a theoretical model and empirical evidence from India. Journal of Development Economics, 88(1), 103-119. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.01.001

Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor economics: a radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty (2a ed.). New York, NY: PublicAffairs.

Barrett, S. M. (2004). Implementation studies: time for a revival? Personal reflections on 20 years of implementation studies. Public Administration, 82(2), 249-262. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00393.x

Berry, C. R., & Howell, W. G. (2007). Accountability and local elections: rethinking retrospective voting. Journal of Politics, 69(3), 844-858. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00579.x

Bolleyer, N. (2011). The influence of political parties on policy coordination. Governance, 24(3), 469-494. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01531.x

Bracco, E., Lockwood, B., Porcelli, F., & Redoano, M. (2015, março). Intergovernmental grants as signals and the alignment effect: theory and evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 123, 78-91. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.11.007

Brollo, F., & Nannicini, T. (2012). Tying your enemy’s hands in close races: the politics of federal transfers in Brazil. American Political Science Review, 106(4), 742-761. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000433

Budge, I., & Laver, M. (1986). Office seeking and policy pursuit in coalition theory. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 11(4), 485-506. Recuperado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/439930

Bueno, N. S. (2017). Bypassing the enemy: distributive politics, credit claiming, and nonstate organizations in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies, 51(3), 304-340. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017710255

Bugarin, M., & Marciniuk, F. (2017). Strategic partisan transfers in a fiscal federation: evidence from a new Brazilian database. Journal of Applied Economics, 20(2), 211-239. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/S1514-0326(17)30010-7

Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D., & Titiunik, R. (2014). Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression-discontinuity designs. Econometrica, 82(6), 2295-2326. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA11757

Castles, F. G. (2009). What welfare states do: a disaggregated expenditure approach. Journal of Social Policy, 38(1), 45-62. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279408002547

Coelho, R., Guth, F., & Loureiro, M. (2020). Capacidades governamentais municipais e desenvolvimento humano local no Brasil. Revista do Serviço Público, 71(4), 778-808. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.21874/rsp.v71i4.4524

Downs, A. (1999). Uma teoria econômica da democracia. São Paulo, SP: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo.

Dunning, T. (2012). Natural experiments in the social sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084444

Eaton, K., & Dickovick, J. T. (2004). The politics of re-centralization in Argentina and Brazil. Latin American Research Review, 39(1), 90-122. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2004.0007

Eggers, A. C., Fowler, A., Hainmueller, J., Hall, A. B., & Snyder, J. M. (2015). On the validity of the regression discontinuity design for estimating electoral effects: new evidence from over 40,000 close races. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 259-274. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12127

Falleti, T. G. (2005). A sequential theory of decentralization: latin american cases in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 327-346. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051695

Falleti, T. G. (2010). Decentralization and subnational politics in Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Fearon, J. D. (1999). Electoral accountability and the control of politicians: selecting good types versus sanctioning poor performance. In A. Przeworski, S. C. Stokes, & B. Manin (Eds.), Democracy, accountability, and representation (pp. 55-97). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175104.003

Fouirnaies, A., & Mutlu-Eren, H. (2015). English bacon: copartisan bias in intergovernmental grant allocation in England. The Journal of Politics, 77(3), 805-817. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1086/681563

Giraudy, A., & Pribble, J. (2020). Territorial inequality in health service delivery: lessons from Latin America’s Federations. Latin American Politics and Society, 62(3), 19-43. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2020.5

Goggin, M. L. (1986). The “too few cases/too many variables” problem in implementation research. Western Political Quarterly, 39(2), 328-347. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/106591298603900210

Golden, M., & Min, B. (2013). Distributive politics around the world. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 73-99. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052209-121553

Grin, E. J. (2016). Rotas federativas para a promoção de capacidades estatais municipais: uma análise da experiência brasileira (Tese de Doutorado). Fundação Getulio Vargas, São Paulo, SP.

Grin, E. J., Nascimento, A. B., Abrucio, F. L., & Fernandes, A. S. (2018). Sobre desconexões e hiatos: uma análise de capacidades estatais e finanças públicas em municípios brasileiros. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 23(76), 312-336. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v23n76.75417

Hasenfeld, Y., & Brock, T. (1991). Implementation of social policy revisited. Administration & Society, 22(4), 451-479. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/009539979102200404

Healy, A., & Lenz, G. S. (2017). Presidential voting and the local economy: evidence from two population-based data sets. Journal of Politics, 79(4), 1419-1432. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1086/692785

Hibbs, D. A. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review, 71(4), 1467-1487. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400269712

Hibbs, D. A. (1992). Partisan theory after fifteen years. European Journal of Political Economy, 8(3), 361-373. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/0176-2680(92)90001-W

Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2002). Implementing public policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.

Hjern, B., & Hull, C. (1982). Implementation Research as Empirical Constitutionalism. European Journal of Political Research, 10(2), 105-115. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1982.tb00011.x

Howlett, M. (2000). Managing the “hollow state”: procedural policy instruments and modern governance. Canadian Public Administration, 43(4), 412-431. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2000.tb01152.x

Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2020). Studying public policy: principles and processes (4a ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2001). Development and crisis of the welfare state: parties and policies in global markets. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2012). Democracy and the left: social policy and inequality in Latin America. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Imbeau, L. M., Pétry, F., & Lamari, M. (2001). Left-right party ideology and government policies: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 40(1), 1-29. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011889915999

Keman, H. (2006). Parties and government: features of governing in representative democracies. In R. S. Katz & W. Crotty (Eds.), Handbook of party politics (Chap. 15, p. 160-174). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publishing. Recuperado de https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608047

Kriner, D. L., & Reeves, A. (2012). The influence of federal spending on presidential elections. American Political Science Review, 106(2), 348-366. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000159

Lee, D. S., Moretti, E., & Butler, M. J. (2004). Do voters affect or elect policies? Evidence from the U. S. House. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(3), 807-859. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553041502153

Lewis-beck, M. S., & Stegmaier, M. (2000). Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 183-219. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.183

Lima, L. L., & D’Ascenzi, L. (2013). Implementação de políticas públicas: perspectivas analíticas. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 21(48), 101-110. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782013000400006

Macedo, A. S., & Ferreira, M. A. M. (2020). Arranjo institucional e a capacidade estatal de implementação do Projeto Mais Médicos Brasil (PMMB). Revista de Sociologia e Política, 28(76), e008. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-987320287608

Manin, B., Przeworski, A., & Stokes, S. C. (1999). Elections and representation. In A. Przeworski, S. C. Stokes, & B. Manin (Eds.), Democracy, accountability, and representation (pp. 29-54). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175104.002

Marenco, A. (2017). Burocracias profissionais ampliam capacidade estatal para implementar políticas? Governos, burocratas e legislação em municípios brasileiros. Dados, 60(4), 1025-1058. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/001152582017141

Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: the ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145-174. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037242

McCrary, J. (2008). Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: a density test. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 698-714. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.005

Meireles, F. (2019). Alinhamento partidário e demanda por transferências federais no Brasil. Revista de Administração Pública, 53(1), 173-194. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220170282

Melo, M. A. (2005). O sucesso inesperado das reformas de segunda geração: federalismo, reformas constitucionais e política social. Dados, 48(4), 845-889. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582005000400004

Niedzwiecki, S. (2018). Uneven social policies: the politics of subnational variation in Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Obinger, H., Leibfried, S., & Castles G., F. (2005). Federalism and the welfare state: new world and European experiences (Vol. 1). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

O’Toole, L. J. (1986). Policy recommendations for multi-actor implementation: an assessment of the field. Journal of Public Policy, 6(2), 181-210. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00006486

Peltzman, S. (1987). Economic conditions and gubernatorial elections. The American Economic Review, 77(2), 293-297. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x9502300104

Pierson, P. (1995). Fragmented welfare states: federal institutions and the development of social policy. Governance, 8(4), 449-478. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.1995.tb00223.x

Pierson, P. (1996). The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics, 48(2), 143-179. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1996.0004

Pires, R. R. C., & Gomide, A. A. (2016). Governança e capacidades estatais: uma análise comparativa de programas federais. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 24(58), 121-143. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-987316245806

Rodrigues-Silveira, R. (2019). Public policy provision from a subnational perspective: context, institutions and spatial inequality. Regional and Federal Studies, 29(2), 275-294. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2019.1566125

Rogers, M. (2021). Federalism and the welfare state in Latin America. Regional and Federal Studies, 31(1), 163-184. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2020.1749841

Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: a systematic approach (7a ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publishing.

Saglie, J. (2019). Do party organizations integrate multi-level states? The case of the Norwegian local government reform. Regional and Federal Studies, 30(4), 579-597. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2019.1684268

Schmidt, M. G. (1996). When parties matter: a review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy. European Journal of Political Research, 30(2), 155-183. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1996.tb00673.x

Schneider, A. (2003). Decentralization: conceptualization and measurement. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(3), 32-56. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686198

Schofield, J. (2001). Time for a revival? Public policy implementation: a review of the literature and an agenda for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(3), 245-263. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00066

Segatto, C. I., Euclydes, F. M., & Abrucio, F. (2021). Capacidades estatais e seus efeitos nas políticas municipais de educação. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 26(84), e-81938. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v26n84.81938

Sellers, J. M., & Lidström, A. (2007). Decentralization, local government, and the welfare state. Governance, 20(4), 609-632. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00374.x

Stepan, A. C. (1999). Federalism and democracy: beyond the U.S. model. Journal of Democracy, 10(4), 19-34. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1999.0072

Stokes, S. C. (1999). Political parties and democracy. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 243-267. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.243

Strøm, K. W. (1990). A behavioral theory of competitive political parties. American Journal of Political Science, 34(2), 565-598. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.2307/2111461

Strøm, K. W., & Müller, W. C. (1999). Political parties and hard choices. In W. C. Müller & K. W. Strøm (Eds.), Policy, office, or votes? How political parties in Western Europe make hard decisions (pp. 1-35). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Thorlakson, L. (2009). Patterns of party integration, influence and autonomy in seven federations. Party Politics, 15(2), 157-177. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068808099979

Touchton, M., Sugiyama, N. B., & Wampler, B. (2017). Democracy at work: moving beyond elections to improve well-being. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 68-82. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541600068X

Van Houten, P. (2009). Multi-level relations in political parties: a delegation approach. Party Politics, 15(2), 137-156. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068808099978

Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: a conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445-488. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404

Vazquez, D. A. (2014). Mecanismos institucionais de regulação federal e seus resultados nas políticas de educação e saúde. Dados, 57(4), 969-1005. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/00115258201430

Vedung, E. (1998). Policy instruments: typologies and theories. In M. L. Bemelmans-Videc, R. Rist, & E. Vedung (Eds.), Carrots, sticks & sermons: policy instruments & their evaluation (pp. 282-319). Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Ventura, T. (2021, fevereiro). Do mayors matter? Reverse coattails on congressional elections in Brazil. Electoral Studies, 69, 102242. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102242

Viana, A. L., & Machado, C. V. (2009). Descentralização e coordenação federativa: a experiência brasileira na saúde. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 14(3), 807-817. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232009000300016

Vieira, F. S., Servo, L. M. S., Benevides, R. P. S., Piola, S. F., & Orair, R. O. (2020, setembro). Gastos em saúde e educação no brasil: impactos da unificação dos pisos constitucionais (Texto para Discussão, 2596). Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada.

Wampler, B., Sugiyama, N. B., & Touchton, M. (2019). Democracy at work: pathways to well-being in Brazil. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108675949

Winter, S. (2003a). Implementation: introduction. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 205-2011). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.

Winter, S. (2003b). Implementation perspectives: status and reconsideration. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 212-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.

Wittman, D. (1983). Candidate motivation: a synthesis of alternative theories. American Political Science Review, 77(1), 142-157. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.2307/1956016

Wolinetz, S. B. (2002). Beyond the catch‐all party: approaches to the study of parties and party organization in contemporary democracies. In R. Gunther, J. R. Montero, & J. J. Linz (Eds.), Political parties: old concepts and new challenges (pp. 136-164). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1093/0199246742.003.0006

Ziblatt, D. (2008). Why some cities provide more public goods than others: a subnational comparison of the provision of public goods in German cities in 1912. Studies in Comparative International Development, 43(3-4), 273-289. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-008-9031-y