Diffusion of the Micro and Small Business Law in municipalities of São Paulo
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article analyzes the implementation of the General Law for Micro and Small Business by municipalities in São Paulo. The theory of policy diffusion was used to study the process of adopting this public policy in the different contexts of coercion. The article presents theoretical discussions on the diffusion mechanism “coercion” and answers the question: what is the influence of the vertical coercion mechanism in the diffusion of the General Law in the municipalities of São Paulo? The survival analysis technique was applied to identify explanatory factors of policy diffusion, considering institutional, political, and party design variables, neighborhood effect, internal needs, organizations/social actors, and structural factors. The results show that as the institutional rules of coercion vary, the explanatory factors of the diffusion change so that local aspects, including social actors, regional factors, and structural issues, matter for the diffusion, varying according to the coercive context.
Downloads
Article Details
The Brazilian Journal of Public Administration (RAP) undertakes to contribute to the protection of authors’ intellectual rights. On this matter:
- It uses the Creative Commons BY (CC-BY) license for all texts it publishes, except when there is indication of specific holders of copyrights and property rights;
- It uses the similarity verification software of content - Plagiarism (Crossref Similarity Check);
- It takes actions to fight against plagiarism and ethical misconduct aligned with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Further information on the Code of Ethics adopted by RAP can be found in Ethical Standards and Code of Conduct.
References
Abrucio, F. L., & Franzese, C. (2007). Federalismo e políticas públicas: o impacto das relações intergovernamentais no Brasil. In M. Araújo, & L. Beira (Orgs.), Tópicos da economia paulista para gestores públicos (Vol. 1, pp. 13-31). São Paulo, SP: Fundap.
Arretche, M. (2012). Democracia, federalismo e centralização no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: SciELO-Editora Fiocruz.
Batista, M. (2017). A difusão da Lei de Acesso à Informação nos municípios brasileiros: determinantes internos e externos (Cadernos Enap, n. 53). Brasília, DF: Fundação Escola Nacional de Administração Pública.
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2010). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Bedê, M. A. (2006). Onde estão as micro e pequenas empresas no Brasil. São Paulo, SP: Sebrae.
Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: an event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 395-415. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.2307/1963526
Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (2018). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In C. M. Weible, & P. A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (4a ed., pp. 253-297). New York, NY: Routledge.
Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., & Jones, B. S. (2004). Event history modeling: a guide for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cardoso, M. S. (2017). O poder de compras e o desenvolvimento econômico local: a avaliação da política pública de compras governamentais no município de Ituverava (SP) (Dissertação de Mestrado). Universidade Estadual Paulista, Franca, SP.
Carvalho, M. S., Andreozzi, V. L., Codeço, C. T., Campos, D. P., Barbosa, M. T. S., & Shimakura, S. E. (2011). Análise de sobrevivência: teoria e aplicações em saúde. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: SciELO-Editora Fiocruz.
Coêlho, D. B. (2016). Mecanismos políticos e institucionais da difusão de políticas. In C. A. P. Faria, D. B. Coêlho, & S. D. Silva (Orgs.), Difusão de políticas públicas. Santo André, SP: Editora da UFABC.
Coêlho, D. B. (2021). Determinants of policy diffusion in Brazil and the U.S. International Review of Public Policy, 3(2), 194-215. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.4000/irpp.2254
Coêlho, D. B., Cavalcante, P., & Turgeon, M. (2016). Mecanismos de difusão de políticas sociais no Brasil: uma análise do Programa Saúde da Família. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 24(58), 145-165. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-987316245807
Colosimo, E. A., & Giolo, S. R. (2006). Análise de sobrevivência aplicada. São Paulo, SP: Editora Blucher.
Dobbin, F., Simmons, B., & Garrett, G. (2007). The global diffusion of public policies: social construction, coercion, competition, or learning? Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 449-472. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.090106.142507
Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: the role of policy transfer in contemporary policy‐making. Governance, 13(1), 5-23. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00121
Evans, M. (2009). Policy transfer in critical perspective. Policy Studies, 30(3), 243-268. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870902863828
Graham, E. R., Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2013). The diffusion of policy diffusion research in political science. British Journal of Political Science, 43(3), 673-701. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000415
Kingdon, J. W. (2011). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2a ed.). Boston, MA: Longman Classics in Political Science.
Leão, A. (2016). Difusão da lei de incentivos à participação das microempresas e empresas de pequeno porte nas compras públicas municipais brasileiras (Dissertação de Mestrado). Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE.
Lei Complementar Federal nº 123, de 14 de dezembro de 2006. (2006). Institui o Estatuto Nacional da Microempresa e da Empresa de Pequeno Porte e dá outras providências. Brasília, DF. Recuperado de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/lcp/lcp123.htm
Lei Complementar nº 147, de 7 de agosto de 2014. (2014). Altera a Lei Complementar no 123, de 14 de dezembro de 2006, e dá outras providências. Brasília, DF. Recuperado de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/lcp/lcp147.htm
Maggetti, M., & Gilardi, F. (2016). Problems (and solutions) in the measurement of policy diffusion mechanisms. Journal of Public Policy, 36(S1), 87-107. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X1400035X
Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). A theory of gradual institutional change. In J. Mahoney, & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Marsh, D., & Sharman, J. C. (2009). Policy diffusion and policy transfer. Policy Studies, 30(3), 269-288. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870902863851
Meseguer, C., & Gilardi, F. (2008). Reflexiones sobre el debate de la difusión de políticas. Política y Gobierno, 15(2), 315-351. Recuperado de http://www.politicaygobierno.cide.edu/index.php/pyg/article/view/221
Mooney, C. Z. (2001). Modeling regional effects on state policy diffusion. Political Research Quarterly, 54(1), 103-124. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290105400106
Pereira, T. L. (2004). Modelos de riscos proporcionais e aditivos para o tratamento de covariáveis dependentes do tempo (Dissertação de Mestrado). Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE.
Pierson, P. (1995). Fragmented welfare states: Federal institutions and the development of social policy. Governance, 8(4), 449-478. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.1995.tb00223.x
Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (2019). The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications. In P. A. Sabatier, & C. M. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 189-220). London, UK: Routledge.
Serviço Brasileiro de Apoio às Micro e Pequenas Empresas. (2013). Anuário do trabalho na micro e pequena empresa. São Paulo, SP: Autor.
Serviço Brasileiro de Apoio às Micro e Pequenas Empresas. (2017). Manual do indicador: municípios com políticas de desenvolvimento implantadas. Brasília, DF: Autor.
Serviço Brasileiro de Apoio às Micro e Pequenas Empresas. (2019). DataSebrae. Recuperado de http://sistema.datasebrae.com.br
Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2012). Policy diffusion: Seven lessons for scholars and practitioners. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 788-796. Recuperado de ttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02610.x
Souza, C. (2008). Federalismo: teorias e conceitos revisitados. Revista Brasileira de Informação Bibliográfica em Ciências Sociais, 65, 27-48. Recuperado de https://bibanpocs.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/311
Sugiyama, N. B. (2012). Diffusion of good government: social sector reforms in Brazil. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Therneau, T. (2015). A package for survival analysis in R. Version 2.38. Recuperado de https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival
Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American States. American Political Science Review, 63(3), 880-899. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.2307/1954434
Wampler, B. (2016). The spread and impact of participatory budgeting: Brazil, Peru, China, South Korea, and the Philippines. In C. A. P. Faria, D. B. Coêlho, & S. D. Silva (Orgs.), Difusão de políticas públicas. Santo André, SP: Editora da UFABC.
Zucco, C., Jr., & Power, T. J. (2021). Fragmentation without cleavages? Endogenous fractionalization in the Brazilian party system. Comparative Politics, 53(3), 477-500. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.5129/001041521X15941508069585