Innovation policy dismantling: strategies and causes in contemporary Brazil

Main Article Content

Pedro Luiz Costa Cavalcante
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7635-695X

Abstract

This paper analyzes the policy dismantling process in the Brazilian innovation system since mid-2010. The research describes how this policy change has been undertaken and explains the strategies deployed and major causes. The study is theoretically grounded in the debate of policy dismantling, meaning changes that result in cuts, reductions, or even abolition of budget, rules, capacities, and instruments of a governmental area. A mixed-methods approach, both quantitative and qualitative, is employed. First, it examines the dismantling process in the last years, focusing on the budget execution patterns of the major policy instruments and agencies in charge of innovation at the federal level. The research relies on the stakeholders’ perception by conducting semi-structured interviews with experts regarding strategies, rationale, reactions, and effects. The empirical findings show the dismantling occurs in both dimensions: density (number of tools reduced) and, mainly, the intensity (budget cuts), varying according to government areas. The interviewees highlighted the prevailing strategy as active dismantling, in which the fiscal austerity aggravated by the COVID-19 crisis, an ideological shift in the government coalition, policy particularities, and a low level of prioritization in innovation by the domestic business community are the main factors that affect the politicians’ preferences to dismantle. Finally, the process seriously affects the national innovation system, such as the loss of bureaucratic and policy capacity, brain drain, and lag in technology, productivity, and consequently, in the country's economic performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Cavalcante, P. L. C. (2024). Innovation policy dismantling: strategies and causes in contemporary Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 58(1), e2022–0358. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220220358
Section
Article

References

Arbix, G. (2016). 2002-2014: trajetória da inovação no Brasil: avanços, indefinições e instabilidade nas políticas de fomento à inovação e tecnologia. https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4210910/mod_resource/content/1/Arbix%20-%20Trajetorias%20da%20inovacao%202016.pdf

Bauer, M. W., & Knill, C. (2013). Understanding Policy Dismantling: an analytical framework. In M. W. Bauer, A. Jordan, C. Green-Pedersen, & A. Héritier (Eds.), Dismantling Public Policy: Preferences, Strategies, and Effects. Oxford Scholarship.

Bauer, M. W., Jordan, A., Green-Pedersen, C., & Héritier, A. (2014). A Conceptual Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Policy Change: Measurement, Explanation, and Strategies of Policy Dismantling. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(1), 28-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2014.885186

Bauer, M., Peters, B., Pierre, J., Yesilkagit, K., & Becker, S. (Eds.). (2021). Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration: How Populists in Government Transform State Bureaucracies. Cambridge University Press.

Bonelli, F., Fernandes, A. S., & Cavalcante, P. (2023). The active dismantling of environmental policy in Brazil: paralysis and setbacks of the deforestation inspection and control. Sustainability in Debate, 14(1), 58-80. https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v14n1.2023.44277

Castro A. (2020). Compared Innovation Policies and State Capabilities: Brazil, China, and Argentina. In A. C. Castro, & R. R. Boschi (Eds.), State capacities and development in emerging countries (Chap. 3). Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia em Políticas Públicas, Estratégias e Desenvolvimento, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. https://alacip.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/CASTRO-BOSCHI-Eds..-State-Capacities-and-Development-in-Emerging-Countries.pdf

Cavalcante, P. (2021). Innovation Policy Governance. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer International Publishing.

Cirera, X., & Maloney, W. F. (2017). The innovation paradox: Developing-country capabilities and the unrealized promise of technological catch-up. The World Bank.

Cirera, X., Frías, J., Hill, J., & Li, Y. (2020). A Practitioner’s Guide to Innovation Policy. Instruments to Build Firm Capabilities and Accelerate Technological Catch-Up in Developing Countries. World Bank.

Câmara dos Deputados. (2023). Execução Orçamentária. https://www2.camara.leg.br/ig-orcamento/

Direito, D., Massaco, K., & Licio, E. (2022). Mudanças De Políticas E (Des)Mobilização De Capacidades Estatais: O Caso Do Cadastro Único Denise Do Carmo (Texto para discussão 2828). Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada, Brasília, DF, Brasil. https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/11638

Edler, J., Cunningham, P., Gök, A., & Shapira, P. (2016). Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Edler, J., & Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: what, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 2-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx001

Gomide, A. A., Silva, M. M. S., & Leopoldi, M. A. (2023). Desmonte e reconfiguração de políticas públicas (2016-2022). Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada, Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia em Políticas Públicas, Estratégias e Desenvolvimento. https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/11939

Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2013). Política Pública, seus ciclos e subsistemas. Ed. Campus.

Jordan, C. Green-Pedersen, C. & Héritier, A. (2013). Policy Dismantling: An Introduction. In M. Bauer, A. Jordan, C. Green-Pedersen, & A. Héritier (Eds.), Dismantling Public Policy: Preferences, Strategies, and Effects. Oxford Scholarship.

Kim, C. S., & Lee, S. (2014). Different paths of deindustrialization: Latin American and Southeast Asian countries from a comparative perspective. Journal of International and Area Studies, 21(2), 65-81. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43490506

Lotta, G. S., Lima, I. A., Fernandez, M., Silveira, M. C., Pedote, J., & Guaranha, O. L. C. (2023). A resposta da burocracia ao contexto de retrocesso democrático: uma análise da atuação de servidores federais durante o Governo Bolsonaro. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, 40, e266094. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-3352.2023.40.266094

Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.) (2010). National systems of innovation - towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Anthem Press.

Lundvall, B.-Å., Joseph, K. J., Chaminade, C., & Vang, J. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Mazzucato, M. (2013). The Entrepreneurial State. Anthem Press.

Mazzucato, M., & Penna, C. (2016). The Brazilian Innovation System: A Mission-Oriented Policy Proposal. Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos. https://www.cgee.org.br/documents/10195/1774546/The_Brazilian_Innovation_System-CGEE-MazzucatoandPenna-FullReport.pdf

Negri, F. & Cavalcante, L. R. (Orgs.). (2014). Produtividade no Brasil: Desempenho e determinantes (Vol. 1). Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada. https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/3289

Negri, F. & Rauen, A. T. (2018). Innovation policies in Brazil during the 2000s: The need for new paths (IPEA Discussion Paper DP 235). Brasília, DF, Brasil. https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/bitstream/11058/8898/1/DiscussionPaper_235.pdf

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2021). OECD Economic Outlook (Volume 2021, Issue 1). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/edfbca02-en

Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge University Press.

Reynolds, E. B., Schneider, B. R., & Zylberberg, E. (Eds.). (2019). Innovation in Brazil: Advancing Development in the 21st Century. Routledge.

Rogge, K. (2018). Designing Complex Policy Mixes: Elements, Processes, and Characteristics. In M. Howlett, & I. Mukherjee (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Policy Design (Routledge Handbook of Policy Design, Chap. 3). Routledge.

Simon, H. A. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852

Trochim, W., Donnelly, J. P., & Arora, K. (2015). Research Methods: The Essential Knowledge Base. Nelson Education, Cengage Learning.

Zuniga, P., Negri, F., Dutz, M. A., Pilat, D., & Rauen, A. (2016). Conditions for innovation in Brazil: A review of key issues and policy challenges (IPEA Discussion Paper DP 0218). Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada, Brasília, DF, Brasil. https://portalantigo.ipea.gov.br/agencia/images/stories/PDFs/TDs/ingles/dp_218.pdf