University governance and institutional performance: an analysis of Brazilian federal university statutes
Main Article Content
Abstract
Brazilian Federal Universities (BFUs), as part of the federal indirect administration, are governed by their university statutes. These normative instruments structure institutional governance by regulating aspects such as the functioning of governing councils, the allocation of public resources, the selection of the Rector, and the rights and duties of the academic community. This study analyzes the relationship between statutory characteristics and the academic and administrative performance of BFUs, focusing on identifying governance elements associated with superior outcomes. The analysis covers the statutes of 69 BFUs, employing a quantitative approach via panel data linear regression and a qualitative analysis of normative content. The performance indicators — the dependent variables — included the General Course Index (IGC), the Success Rate, and the Current Cost per Student. Results indicate that the mere existence of a statute is not associated with institutional performance. However, specific provisions, such as the accountability of governing councils, the method of selecting the Rector, student rights, and faculty evaluation mechanisms, show a correlation with performance indicators. This study contributes to the literature on university governance by highlighting the role of statutes in the institutional efficiency of Brazilian federal universities.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RAP is committed to contributing to the protection of the author's intellectual rights. In this regard, it:
- Adopts the Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, provided that the original work is properly cited;
- Ensures moral and usage rights of the article to authors, in accordance with Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0. Authors retain the copyright to the published article, and the journal holds the right of first publication;
- Utilizes content similarity/plagiarism detection software (Crossref Similarity Check);
- Recommends the use of CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) authorship criteria;
- Adopts actions to combat plagiarism and ethical misconduct, aligned with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines;
- Reserves the right to make changes to the original versions regarding normative, spelling, and grammatical standards to maintain high linguistic quality and layout standardization, while respecting the authors' style. Subsequently, authors will receive the final versions for approval prior to publication.
Further information on the Code of Ethics adopted by RAP can be found in Ethical Standards and Code of Conduct.
References
Alajmi, M. (2022). School principals’ experiences of autonomy and accountability: outcomes of the School Education Quality Improvement Project in Kuwait. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(4), 606-617.
Baltaru, R. D., & Soysal, Y. N. (2018). Administrators in higher education: organizational expansion in a transforming institution. Higher Education, 76(2), 213-229.
Barbosa, M. A. C., & Mendonça, J. R. C. (2016). O professor-gestor e as políticas institucionais para formação de professores de ensino superior para a gestão universitária. Revista Economia & Gestão, 16(42), 61-88.
Baum, J. A., & Singh, J. V. (1994). Organizational niches and the dynamics of organizational founding. Organization Science, 5(4), 483-501.
Boitier, M., & Rivière, A. (2013). Freedom and responsibility for French universities: from global steering to local management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(4), 616-649.
Broucker, B., De Wit, K., & Verhoeven, J. C. (2018). Higher education for public value: taking the debate beyond New Public Management. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(2), 227-240.
Cavalcanti, M. M. D. A. (2006). Avaliação de políticas públicas e programas governamentais: uma abordagem conceitual. Interfaces de Saberes, 6(1). http://www.socialiris.org/antigo/imagem/boletim/arq48975df171def. pdf
Christensen, T. (2011). University governance reforms: potential problems of more autonomy? Higher Education, 62(4), 503-517.
Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. (1988). Presidência da República. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm
Costa, E. M., Souza, H. R. D., Ramos, F. D. S., & Silva, J. L. M. D. (2012). Eficiência e desempenho no ensino superior: uma análise da fronteira de produção educacional das IFES brasileiras. Revista de Economia Contemporânea, 16, 415-440.
D’Aunno, T., Succi, M., & Alexander, J. A. (2000). The role of institutional and market forces in divergent organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4), 679-703.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 1-1. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000
Davies, S., & Quirke, L. (2007). The impact of sector on school organizations: institutional and market logics. Sociology of Education, 80(1), 66-89.
Davis, A., Jansen van Rensburg, M., & Venter, P. (2016). The impact of managerialism on the strategy work of university middle managers. Studies in Higher Education, 41(8), 1480-1494.
Decreto nº 9.203, de 22 de novembro de 2017. (2017). Dispõe sobre a política de governança da administração pública federal direta, autárquica e fundacional. Presidência da República. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2017/decreto/d9203.htm
Decreto-Lei nº 200, de 25 de fevereiro de 1967. (1967). Dispõe sobre a organização da Administração Federal, estabelece diretrizes para a Reforma Administrativa e dá outras providências. Presidência da República. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del0200.htm
Denison, D. R., Haaland, S., & Goelzer, P. (2003). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness: is there a similar pattern around the world? In W. H. Mobley & P. W. Dorfman, Advances in global leadership (pp. 205-27, Vol. 3). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Gilson, R. J. (1996). Corporate governance and economic efficiency: when do institutions matter. Washington University Law Review, 74(2), 327-345. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1606&context=law_lawreview
Habersam, M., Piber, M., & Skoog, M. (2013). Knowledge balance sheets in Austrian universities: the implementation, use, and re-shaping of measurement and management practices. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(4-5), 319-337.
Hai, P. T. T., & Anh, L. T. K. (2022). Academic staff’s participation in university governance-a move towards autonomy and its practical problems. Studies in Higher Education, 47(8), 1613-1626.
Hanushek, E. A. (1996). Measuring investment in education. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(4), 9-30. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.10.4.9
Hill, C. J., & Lynn Jr, L. E. (2004). Governance and public management, an introduction. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 3-11.
Huang, F., Daizen, T., & Kim, Y. (2020). Changes in Japanese universities governance arrangements 1992–2017. Studies in Higher Education, 45(10), 2063-2072.
Huisman, J., & Currie, J. (2004). Accountability in higher education: bridge over troubled water? Higher Education, 48, 529-551.
Instituto Brasileiro de Governança Corporativa. (2006). Manual prático de recomendações estatutárias. IBGC. https://acervo-digital.espm.br/E-BOOKS/Acesso%20restrito/318422.pdf
Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira. (2022). Censo da Educação Superior 2021: notas estatísticas. Inep. https://www.gov.br/inep/pt-br/areas-de-atuacao/pesquisas-estatisticas-e-indicadores/indicadores-de-qualidade-da-educacao-superior
International Federation of Accountants. (2001). Study 13. Governance in the public sector: a governing body perspective. https://www.ifac.org/_flysystem/azure-private/publications/files/study-13-governance-in-th.pdf.
Johnes, J. (2006). Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education. Economics of Education Review, 25(3), 273-288.
Knott, J. H., & Payne, A. A. (2004). The impact of state governance structures on management and performance of public organizations: a study of higher education institutions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(1), 13-30.
Lei nº 12.772, de 28 de dezembro de 2012. (2012). Dispõe sobre a estruturação do Planos de Carreira e Cargos de Magistério Federal. Presidência da República. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2012/lei/l12772.htm
Lei nº 5.540, de 28 de novembro de 1968. (1968). Fixa normas de organização e funcionamento do ensino superior e sua articulação com a escola média, e dá outras providências. Presidência da República. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l5540.htm
Lei nº 9.394, de 20 de dezembro de 1996. (1996). Estabelece as diretrizes e bases da educação nacional. Presidência da República. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9394.htm
Martins, A. P. A., Laranja, L. S., Lucio, M. D. L., & Grin, E. J. (2022). Sentidos e usos da governança pública na administração pública brasileira: análise do discurso das diretrizes do Tribunal de Contas da União e do Decreto 9.203/2017. In XLVI Encontro Nacional da Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
Michelberger, K. (2016). Corporate governance effects on firm performance: a literature review. Regional Formation & Development Studies, 20(3), 84-95.
Ollaik, L. G., & Medeiros, J. J. (2011). Instrumentos governamentais: reflexões para uma agenda de pesquisas sobre implementação de políticas públicas no Brasil. Revista de Administração Pública, 45, 1943-1967.
Salemans, L., & Budding, T. (2022). Operationalizing public value in higher education: the use of narratives as an alternative for performance indicators. Journal of Management and Governance, 26(2), 337-363.
Santos, R. R. D., & Rover, S. (2019). Influência da governança pública na eficiência da alocação dos recursos públicos. Revista de Administração Pública, 53, 732-752.
Seneviratne, C. P., & Martino, A. L. (2021). Budgeting as practice and knowing in action: experimenting with Bourdieu’s theory of practice: an empirical evidence from a public university. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 6(3), 309-323.
Shattock, M. (2008). The change from private to public governance of British higher education: its consequences for higher education policy making 1980-2006. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(3), 181-203.
Su, L., & Sun, J. (2014). The governance of university based on the university statute. In Y. Cai & V. Kohtmaki, Transformation of higher education in innovation systems in China and Finland (pp. 245-260). Tampere University Press. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/250152303.pdf#page=247
Teixeira, A. F., & Gomes, R. C. (2019). Governança pública: uma revisão conceitual. Revista do Serviço Público, 70(4), 519-550.
Vale, J., Amaral, J., Abrantes, L., Leal, C., & Silva, R. (2022). Management accounting and control in higher education institutions: a systematic literature review. Administrative Sciences, 12(1), 14.