Integración entre gobernanza, gestión de riesgos e integridad en la administración pública
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Este estudio investiga la integración entre la gobernanza, la gestión de riesgos y la integridad en la administración pública federal, a través de una revisión sistemática de la literatura en los periódicos de Journal Citation Reports. El análisis incluye artículos publicados entre 2000 y 2024 en las bases de Web of Science y Scopus, aplicando el protocolo Methodi Ordinatio para seleccionar los estudios más relevantes. Los hallazgos indican que la gobernanza es un elemento estructurante, que promueve un ambiente institucional sólido para mitigar los riesgos y fortalecer la integridad pública. La gestión de riesgos fomenta una cultura organizacional ética, proactiva y resiliente, mientras que la integridad pública, fundamentada en valores éticos y en el combate a la corrupción, refuerza la transparencia y amplía la confianza social. El análisis destaca el papel estratégico de las tecnologías digitales, la innovación organizacional y el liderazgo ético en la prevención de la corrupción y la modernización de la gestión pública. Como principal contribución, la investigación propone un modelo teórico integrador para respaldar políticas públicas, optimizar decisiones e perfeccionar prácticas administrativas, fortaleciendo la gobernanza e impulsando la eficacia, la transparencia y la credibilidad de las instituciones gubernamentales.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
La RAP se compromete a contribuir con la protección de los derechos intelectuales del autor. En ese sentido:
- Adopta la licencia Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0, que permite que los artículos sean reutilizados y distribuidos sin restricciones, siempre que el trabajo original sea correctamente citado;
- Asegura los derechos morales y de uso del artículo a los autores, conforme a la licencia Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0. Los autores conservan los derechos de autor sobre el artículo publicado e la revista tiene el derecho de primera publicación;
- Adopta software de verificación de similitud de contenido - plagio (Crossref Similarity Check);
- Recomienda el uso de los criterios de autoría de CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy);
- Adopta acciones de combate al plagio y a la mala conducta ética, alineadas con las directrices del Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE);
- La revista se reserva el derecho de realizar en las versiones originales alteraciones únicamente de orden normativo, ortográfico y gramatical, con el fin de mantener el estándar culto de la lengua y la estandarización del formato (layout), respetando, no obstante, el estilo de los autores. Posteriormente, los autores recibirán las versiones finales para su aprobación antes de la publicación.
Más detalles del Código de Ética adoptado por RAP pueden ser vistos en Normas éticas y Código de conducta.
Citas
Adelopo, I., & Rufai, I. (2020). Trust deficit and anti-corruption initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 163(3), 429-449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4059-z
Alam, M. M., Said, J., & Abd Aziz, M. A. (2019). Role of integrity system, internal control system and leadership practices on the accountability practices in the public sectors of Malaysia. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(7), 955-976. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-03-2017-0051
Almheiri, H. M., Ahmad, S. Z., Bakar, A. R. A., & Khalid, K. (2024). Artificial intelligence capabilities, dynamic capabilities, and organizational creativity: Contributing factors to the United Arab Emirates Government’s organizational performance. Journal of Modelling in Management, 19(3), 953-979. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-11-2022-0272
Amâncio, D. L. P., Faria, E. R. D., & Biscaia, R. O. B. M. (2024). Integridade pública: (De) limitações conceituais e caminhos para uma agenda robusta. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 29, e90895. https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v28.90895
Andersson, S. (2017). Beyond unidimensional measurement of corruption. Public Integrity, 19(1), 58-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2016.1200408
Androniceanu, A., Georgescu, I., & Kinnunen, J. (2022). Public administration digitalization and corruption in the EU member states: a comparative and correlative research analysis. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 18(65), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.65E.1
Armstrong, E. (2005). Integrity, transparency, and accountability in public administration: Recent trends, regional and international developments and emerging issues. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 1(10), 1-10. https://www.insightsonindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/integrity-transparency-un.pdf
Becker, P., & Smidt, S. (2016). Risk management in organizations: ISO 31000 and beyond. Journal of Risk Research, 19(1), 12-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.12.001
Bergue, S. T. (2022). Ética, códigos de conduta e integridade na administração pública brasileira. Administração Pública e Gestão Social, 14(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.21118/apgs.v14i4.13459
Bergue, S. T. (2023). Integridade: problematizando o conceito no contexto da administração pública brasileira. In Anais do 10º Encontro Brasileiro de Administração Pública, Brasília, DF, Brasil. https://sbap.org.br/ebap-2023/anais/documento_final-167.pdf
Bockius, H., & Gatzert, N. (2024). Organizational risk culture: a literature review on dimensions, assessment, value relevance, and improvement levers. European Management Journal, 42(4), 539-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2023.02.002
Cagnin, F., Oliveira, M. C., & Cauchick Miguel, P. A. (2019). Assessment of ISO 9001: 2015 implementation: focus on risk management approach requirements compliance in an automotive company. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 32(9-10), 1147-1165. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2019.1677151
Cappelli, L., Pisano, A., Iannucci, E., Papetti, P., D'Ascenzo, F., & Ruggieri, R. (2024). Digitalization and prevention of corruption: opportunities and risks - Some evidence from the Italian university system. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(1), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3332
Cardoni, A., Kiseleva, E., & Lombardi, R. (2020). A sustainable governance model to prevent corporate corruption: integrating anticorruption practices, corporate strategy, and business processes. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1173-1185. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2424
Carr, D. N. (2023). Interpreting integrity: a qualitative approach. Public Integrity, 25(2), 234-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2022.2033065
Cavalcante, P., & Braga, M. (2024, outubro 03). A esfinge da integridade pública. Estadão. https://www.estadao.com.br/politica/gestao-politica-e-sociedade/a-esfinge-da-integridade-publica
Ceschel, F., Hinna, A., & Homberg, F. (2022). Public sector strategies in curbing corruption: a review of the literature. Public Organization Review, 22(3), 571-591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-022-00639-4
Controladoria-Geral da União. (2023). Ministro da CGU anuncia Modelo de Maturidade em Integridade Pública. https://www.gov.br/cgu/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/2023/12/ministro-da-cgu-anuncia-modelo-de-maturidade-em-integridade-publica
Controladoria-Geral da União. (2024). Plano de Integridade e Combate à Corrupção 2025-2027. https://www.gov.br/cgu/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/2024/12/cgu-lanca-plano-inedito-de-integridade-e-combate-a-corrupcao-com-ampla-participacao-social
Decreto nº 9.203, de 22 de novembro de 2017. (2017). Dispõe sobre a política de governança da administração pública federal direta, autárquica e fundacional. https://pesquisa.in.gov.br/imprensa/jsp/visualiza/index.jsp?data=23/11/2017&jornal=515&pagina=3&totalArquivos=112
Decreto nº 11.529, de 16 de maio de 2023. (2023). Institui o Sistema de Integridade, Transparência e Acesso à Informação da Administração Pública Federal e a Política de Transparência e Acesso à Informação da Administração Pública Federal. https://pesquisa.in.gov.br/imprensa/jsp/visualiza/index.jsp?data=17/05/2023&jornal=515&pagina=2&totalArquivos=156
De Lorena, A. L. F., & Costa, A. P. C. S. (2023). What entails risk management maturity in public organisations? Journal of Risk Research, 26(5), 563-580. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2023.2187435
Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2003). The new public service: an approach to reform. International Review of Public Administration, 8(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2003.10805013
Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 671-689). Sage.
Filgueiras, F. (2011). Além da transparência: accountability e política da publicidade. Lua nova: revista de cultura e política, 84, 65-94. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-64452011000300004
Fotaki, M., Lioukas, S., & Voudouris, I. (2020). Ethos is destiny: organizational values and compliance in corporate governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(1), 19-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04126-7
Gomes, R. C., Osborne, S. P., & Guarnieri, P. (2020). Influências dos stakeholders e desempenho do governo local: uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Revista de Administração Pública, 54(3), 448-467. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220180256
Grin, E. J., & Abrucio, F. L. (2021). Hybridism as a national policy style: paths and dilemmas of the majoritarian and consensus approaches in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, 35, e234516. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-3352.2021.35.234516
Hansen, M. T. (2009). Collaboration: how leaders avoid the traps, create unity, and reap big results. Harvard Business Press.
Hood, C. (1991). Public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
Huberts, L. (2014). The integrity of governance: What it is, what we know, what is done and where to go. Springer.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1979). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. In K. Brunner (Eds.), Economics Social Institutions (Rochester Studies in Economics and Policy Issues, Vol. 1). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9257-3_8
Kalina, I., Khurdei, V., Shevchuk, V., Vlasiuk, T., & Leonidov, I. (2022). Introduction of a corporate security risk management system: the experience of Poland. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(8), 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15080335
Kettl, D. F. (2000). The global public management revolution: A report on the transformation of governance. Brookings Institution.
Kooiman, J. (2010). Governance and governability. In S. P. Osborne (Ed.), The new public governance? (pp. 88-102). Routledge.
Lapsley, I. (2009). New public management: the cruellest invention of the human spirit? Abacus, 45(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00275.x
Le, N. T., Vu, L. T., & Nguyen, T. V. (2021). The use of internal control systems and codes of conduct as anti-corruption practices: evidence from Vietnamese firms. Baltic Journal of Management, 16(2), 173-189. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-09-2020-0338
Malik, A., & Froese, F. J. (2022). Corruption as a perverse Innovation: the dark side of digitalization and corruption in international business. Journal of Business Research, 145, 682-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.032
Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 110(3), 681-712. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946696
Matias-Pereira, J. (2022). Governança no setor público: ênfase na melhoria da gestão, transparência e participação da sociedade. Brazilian Journal of Development, 8(8), 56419-56441. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv8n8-105
Meijer, A., ’t Hart, P., & Worthy, B. (2018). Assessing government transparency: an interpretive framework. Administration & Society, 50(4), 501-526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715598341
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American journal of sociology, 83(2), 340-363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Monteduro, F., Cecchetti, I., Lai, Y., & Allegrini, V. (2021). Does stakeholder engagement affect corruption risk management? Journal of Management and Governance, 25(3), 759-785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-020-09527-9
Nunes, C., Gomes, P., & Santana, J. (2023). Transparência, accountability e governance: revisão sistemática da literatura nos hospitais públicos. Revista de Administração Pública, 57(2), e2022-0238. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220220238
Oliveira, A. G. D., & Pisa, B. J. (2015). IGovP: índice de avaliação da governança pública-instrumento de planejamento do Estado e de controle social pelo cidadão. Revista de Administração Pública, 49(5), 1263-1290. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612136179
Oliveira, T. M. D., Jr., Rodrigues, K. F., Silva, S. D. A. M. E., & Bergue, S. T. (2024). Integridade, ética e combate à corrupção no campo da administração pública brasileira: desafios conceituais e horizontes possíveis. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 29, e92312. https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v29.92312
Oliveira, V. G., & Abib, G. (2024). Risco na administração pública: uma revisão sistemática focada em uma agenda de pesquisas futuras. Revista de Administração Pública, 57(6), e2022-0419. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220220419
Oliveira, A. B. (2025). Resultado da seleção de artigos após a aplicação da etapa 7 da Methodi Ordinatio. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14783395
Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico. (2017). Recomendação do Conselho da OCDE sobre Integridade Pública. OECD Publishing. https://repositorio.cgu.gov.br/handle/1/69726
Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico. (2022). Manual de Integridade Pública da OCDE. OECD Publishing.
Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico. (2023). Strengthening integrity leadership in Brazil’s federal public administration: Applying behavioural insights for public integrity. OECD Publishing.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Plume.
Osborne, S. P. (2006). The New Public Governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022
Osborne, S. P. (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge.
Pagani, R. N., Kovaleski, J. L., & Resende, L. M. (2015). Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citations, and year of publication. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2109-2135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1744-x
Pagani, R. N., Kovaleski, J. L., & Resende, L. M. M. (2017). Avanços na composição da Methodi Ordinatio para revisão sistemática de literatura. Ciência da Informação, 46(2), 161-187. https://doi.org/10.18225/ci.inf.v46i2.1886
Pagani, R. N., Pedroso, B., Santos, C. B., Picinin, C. T., & Kovaleski, J. L. (2023). Methodi Ordinatio 2.0: revisited under statistical estimation, and presenting FInder and RankIn. Quality & Quantity, 57(5), 4563-4602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01562-y
Paine, L. S. (1994). Managing for organizational integrity. Harvard business review, 72(2), 106-117.
Paine, L. S. (2024). Managing for organisational integrity. In M. Kaptein (Ed.), Research Handbook on Organisational Integrity (pp. 8-23). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Parris, D. L., Dapko, J. L., Arnold, R. W., & Arnold, D. (2016). Exploring transparency: a new framework for responsible business management. Management Decision, 54(1), 222-247. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2015-0279
Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 223-243. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024379
Peters, B. G. (2010). Meta-governance and public management. In S. P. Osborne (Ed.), The new public governance? (pp. 52-67). Routledge.
Poppo, L., & Schepker, D. J. (2010). Repairing public trust in organizations. Corporate Reputation Review, 13, 124-141. https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2010.12
Power, M., Scheytt, T., Soin, K., & Sahlin, K. (2009). Reputational risk as a logic of organizing in late modernity. Organization studies, 30(2-3), 301-324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608101482
Santhiapillai, F. P., & Ratnayake, R. C. (2022). Risk-based prioritization method for planning and allocation of resources in public sector. The TQM Journal, 34(4), 829-844. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/TQM-02-2021-0039
Santos, L. S., & Serafim, M. C. (2024). Em busca de uma ética administrativa pós-convencional no contexto das organizações públicas brasileiras. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 29, e90978. https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v29.90978
Schembera, S., Haack, P., & Scherer, A. G. (2023). From compliance to progress: a sensemaking perspective on the governance of corruption. Organization Science, 34(3), 1184-1215. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1614
Schnackenberg, A. K., Tomlinson, E., & Coen, C. (2021). The dimensional structure of transparency: a construct validation of transparency as disclosure, clarity, and accuracy in organizations. Human Relations, 74(10), 1628-1660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726720933317
Sheedy, E., & Griffin, B. (2018). Risk governance, structures, culture, and behavior: a view from the inside. Corporate Governance: an International Review, 26(1), 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12200
Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 747-770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
Thommandru, A., Maratovich, F. F., & Saparovna, N. S. (2024). Fortifying Uzbekistan's integrity landscape: Harnessing India's tech-driven anti-corruption strategies. Sustainable Futures, 7, 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100206
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British journal of management, 14(3), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Transparência Internacional. (2024). Índice de percepção da corrupção 2023. http://www.transparenciainternacional.org.br/ipc
Tsao, Y. C., & Hsueh, S. J. (2023). Can the country’s perception of corruption change? Evidence of corruption perception index. Public Integrity, 25(4), 415-427. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2022.2054571
Van der Wal, Z., De Graaf, G., & Lasthuizen, K. (2008). What’s valued most? Similarities and differences between the organizational values of the public and private sector. Public administration, 86(2), 465-482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00719.x
Van de Walle, S., & Migchelbrink, K. (2022). Institutional quality, corruption, and impartiality: The role of process and outcome for citizen trust in public administration in 173 European regions. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 25(1), 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2020.1719103
Vaz, T. H. B., & Mastrodi, J. (2021). O compliance na Administração Pública: a realidade brasileira submetida a normas de integridade. Revista do Direito Público, 16(2), 64-89. https://doi.org/10.5433/1980-511X.2021v16n2p64
Vieira, J. B., & Barreto, R. T. S. (2019). Governança, gestão de riscos e integridade. ENAP.
Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., Rubino, M., Garegnani, G. M. (2021). Do cultural differences impact ethical issues? Exploring the relationship between national culture and quality of code of ethics. Journal of International Management, 27(1), 100823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2021.100823
Wu, Y., & van Rooij, B. (2021). Compliance dynamism: Capturing the polynormative and situational nature of business responses to law. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(3), 579-591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04234-4
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971