Más allá del toolkit: el proceso de compras públicas de innovación en revisión sistemática
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Este estudio tuvo como objetivo proponer un marco teórico de orientación del proceso de compras públicas de innovación, fundamentado en una revisión sistemática de la literatura, con el fin de contribuir al perfeccionamiento de las perspectivas presentes en los toolkits. Se analizaron 189 artículos procedentes de las bases Scopus, Web of Science y el Portal de periódicos de Capes, de los cuales 27 cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. Los resultados presentan una síntesis crítica e integradora de los enfoques de la literatura, lo que permitió la construcción de un marco que articula dos dimensiones complementarias: una horizontal, relacionada con el contexto político e institucional, y otra vertical, referente a las etapas específicas del proceso de adquisición. El marco propone una lectura analítica que integra aspectos previamente tratados de manera fragmentada, reconociendo el carácter interactivo, no lineal y sujeto a reconfiguraciones de las compras públicas de innovación. Al abordar las limitaciones de los enfoques normativos, el marco refuerza la consolidación de una base conceptual más sólida, capaz de orientar políticas públicas y fomentar investigaciones futuras.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
La RAP se compromete a contribuir con la protección de los derechos intelectuales del autor. En ese sentido:
- Adopta la licencia Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0, que permite que los artículos sean reutilizados y distribuidos sin restricciones, siempre que el trabajo original sea correctamente citado;
- Asegura los derechos morales y de uso del artículo a los autores, conforme a la licencia Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0. Los autores conservan los derechos de autor sobre el artículo publicado e la revista tiene el derecho de primera publicación;
- Adopta software de verificación de similitud de contenido - plagio (Crossref Similarity Check);
- Recomienda el uso de los criterios de autoría de CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy);
- Adopta acciones de combate al plagio y a la mala conducta ética, alineadas con las directrices del Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE);
- La revista se reserva el derecho de realizar en las versiones originales alteraciones únicamente de orden normativo, ortográfico y gramatical, con el fin de mantener el estándar culto de la lengua y la estandarización del formato (layout), respetando, no obstante, el estilo de los autores. Posteriormente, los autores recibirán las versiones finales para su aprobación antes de la publicación.
Más detalles del Código de Ética adoptado por RAP pueden ser vistos en Normas éticas y Código de conducta.
Citas
Archibugi, D., Fillippetti, A., & Frenz, M. (2019). Investment in innovation for European recovery: a public policy priority. Science and Public Policy, 47(1), 92-102. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz049
Babiča, V., & Sceulovs, D. (2019). Public procurement of innovation: selection of the sustainable alternative. Economics and Business, 33(1), 233-246. https://doi.org/10.2478/eb-2019-0017
Chidamber, S. R., & Kon, H. B. (1994). A research retrospective of innovation inception and success: the technology-push, demand-pull question. International Journal of Technology Management, 9(1), 94-112. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.1994.025565
Comissão Europeia. (2021). Orientações sobre contratos públicos de inovação. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/45975
Crespi, F., & Guarascio, D. (2019). The demand-pull effect of public procurement on innovation and industrial renewal. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(4), 793-815. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty055
Crisan, D. (2020). Buying with intent: public procurement for innovation by provincial and municipal governments. The School of Public Policy Publications, 13(18), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.11575/sppp.v13i0.69277
Dai, X., Li, Y., & Chen, K. (2021). Direct demand-pull and indirect certification effects of public procurement for innovation. Technovation, 101, 102198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102198
Daneshkohan, H., Razavi, M. R., & Boushehri, A. (2022). Analyzing the effective factors to design public procurement of innovation policy: case studies oil, power and roads sectors. Journal of Improvement Management, 16(2), 131-161. https://doi.org/10.22034/jmi.2022.319347.2715
Delina, R., Gróf, M., & Dráb, R. (2021). Understanding the determinants and specifics of pre-commercial procurement. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research, 16(2), 80-100. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762021000200106
Demircioglu, M. A., & Vivona, R. (2021). Positioning public procurement as a procedural tool for innovation: an empirical study. Policy and Society, 40(3), 379-396, https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1955465
Edler, J., & Georghiou, L. (2007). Public procurement and innovation – resurrecting the demand side. Research Policy, 36(7), 949-963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003
Edquist, C., & Hommen, L. (2000). Public technology procurement and innovation theory. In C. Edquist, L. Hommen & S. Tsipouri (Eds.), Public technology procurement and innovation (Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation series, Vol. 16, pp. 5-70). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4611-5_2
Edquist, C., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2012). Public procurement for innovation as mission-oriented innovation policy. Research policy, 41(10), 1757-1769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.022
Edquist, C., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2020). Functional procurement for innovation, welfare, and the environment. Science and Public Policy, 47(5), 595-603. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa046
Elsbach, K. D., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2020). Creating high‐impact literature reviews: an argument for ‘integrative reviews’. Journal of management studies, 57(6), 1277-1289. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12581
Georghiou, L., Edler, J., Uyarra, E., & Yeow, J. (2014). Policy instruments for public procurement of innovation: choice, design and assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 86, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.018
Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., & McGuinness, L. A. (2022). PRISMA2020: um pacote R e aplicativo Shiny para produzir diagramas de fluxo compatíveis com PRISMA 2020, com interatividade para transparência digital otimizada. Open Synthesis Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18, e1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230
Hommen, L., & Rolfstam, M. (2008). Public procurement and innovation: towards a taxonomy. Journal of Public Procurement, 8(3), 17-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-08-03-2008-B001
Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., & Woo, J. J. (2015). From tools to toolkits in policy design studies: the new design orientation towards policy formulation research. Policy & Politics, 43(2), 291-311. https://doi.org/10.1332/147084414X13992869118596
Kattel, R., & Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabilities in the public sector. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 787-801. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty032
Knutsson, H., & Thomasson, A. (2013). Innovation in the public procurement process: a study of the creation of innovation-friendly public procurement. Public Management Review, 16(2), 242-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.806574
Lember, V., Kattel, R., & Kalvet, T. (2015). Quo vadis public procurement of innovation? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28(3), 403-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2015.1043245
Li, Y., Ribeiro, C. G., Rauen, A. T., & Inácio, E. I. Jr. (2020). Buying to develop: the experience of Brazil and China in using public procurement to drive innovation. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 17(3), 2050021. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877020500212
Lymer, G., Leliaert, F., Mergen, P., & Pijls, S. (2023). Pre-commercial procurement framework and European funding sources for European research infrastructure consortiums: insights from the DiSSCo ERIC development. Research Ideas and Outcomes, 9, e113294. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.9.e113294
Mazzucato, M. (2014). O estado empreendedor: desmascarando o mito do setor público vs. setor privado. Portfólio Penguin.
Odei, S. A., Prazak, P., Soukal, I., & Hamplová, E. F. (2023). Do innovations and external collaboration influence public procurement contracts' success? Evidence from catching-up Visegrád Group economies. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 38(2), 808-830. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2023.2238909
Ortega-Laurel, C. (2021). The state as a smart consumer to carry out public procurement of innovation. PAAKAT: Revista de Tecnología y Sociedad, 11(20). https://doi.org/10.32870/pk.a11n20.532
Pihlajamaa, M., & Merisalo, M. (2021). Organizing innovation contests for public procurement of innovation–a case study of smart city hackathons in Tampere, Finland. European Planning Studies, 29(10), 1906-1924. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1894097
Procuradoria-Geral do Estado de São Paulo. (2023). Toolkit do Marco Legal de CT&I. https://www.toolkitcti.org/
Radicic, D. (2019). Effectiveness of public procurement of innovation versus supply-side innovation measures in manufacturing and service sectors. Science and Public Policy, 46(5), 732-746. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz026
Ramos, A. C. F. (2013). Lições aprendidas como alavancador do conhecimento organizacional: um estudo de caso com aquisições internacionais. In M. V. R. Rodriguez (Org.), Gestão do Conhecimento e Inovação nas Empresas. Qualitymark.
Rauen, A. T. (2015). Compras públicas de P&D no Brasil: o uso do Artigo 20 da Lei de Inovação. In Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (Ed.), Radar: tecnologia, produção e comércio exterior (Nº 40, Cap. 2). https://portalantigo.ipea.gov.br/agencia/images/stories/PDFs/radar/150903_radar_40_cap2.pdf
Rocha, F. (2019). Compras governamentais para inovação aumentam o esforço inovador? Evidências ao caso brasileiro. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 18(1), 37-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v18i1.8653575
Rolfstam, M. (2012a). An institutional approach to research on public procurement of innovation. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(3), 303-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.717475
Rolfstam, M. (2012b). Understanding public procurement of innovation: definitions, innovation types and interaction modes. Innovation Types and Interaction Modes. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2011488
Sánchez-Carreira, M. D. C., Peñate-Valentín, M. C., & Varela-Vázquez, P. (2019a). Public procurement of innovation and regional development in peripheral areas. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1), 119-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1528142
Sánchez-Carreira, M. D. C., Peñate-Valentín, M. C., & Varela-Vázquez, P. (2019b). La compra pública de innovación: análisis de la experiencia de Galicia en el ámbito sanitario. Revista Galega de Economía, 28(2), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.15304/rge.28.2.6158
Schönfeld, K. C., & Ferreira, A. (2021). Urban planning and European innovation policy: achieving sustainability, social inclusion, and economic growth? Sustainability, 13(3), 1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031137
Souza, C. (2017). Modernização do Estado e construção de capacidade burocrática para a implementação de políticas federalizadas. Revista de Administração Pública, 51(1), 27-45. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612150933
Suhonen, N., Tammi, T., Saastamoinen, J., Pesu, J., Turtiainen, M., & Okkonen, L. (2019). Incentives and risk-sharing in public procurement of innovations: towards contracting strategy framework. Journal of Public Procurement, 19(2), 129-145. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-06-2019-029
Talebi, A., & Rezania, D. (2020). Governance of projects in public procurement of innovation a multi-level perspective. Journal of public procurement, 20(2), 187-206. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-01-2019-0005
Talebi, A., Rezania, D., & Bragues, G. (2021). Value creation in public procurement of innovation: a case of engaging start-ups by a local government. Local Government Studies, 48(4), 655-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1870959
Tammi, T., Saastamoinen, J., & Reijonen, H. (2020). Public procurement as a vehicle of innovation – What does the inverted-U relationship between competition and innovativeness tell us? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119922
Tribunal de Contas da União; & Instituto Serzedello Corrêa. (2022). Jornada de compras públicas de inovação. https://portal.tcu.gov.br/publicacoes-institucionais/cartilha-manual-ou-tutorial/jornada-de-compras-publicas-de-inovacao
Uyarra, E., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., Flanagan, K., & Magro, E. (2020). Public procurement, innovation and industrial policy: rationales, roles, capabilities and implementation. Research Policy, 49(1), 103844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103844
Veneziani, J., & Vaz, J. C. (2023). Public procurement of innovation in Latin America: a comparative analysis of the most innovative countries. In Proceedings of the 16º International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil. https://doi.org/10.1145/3614321.3614337
Viríssimo, T., Baretta, J. V., Hoffmann, M. G., & Farias, J. S. (2023). Qual é mesmo o nosso problema? Desafios às compras públicas de inovação. Revista Alcance, 30(1), 103-115. https://doi.org/10.14210/alcance.v30n1(Jan/Abr).p104-117
Winden, V. W., & Carvalho, L. (2019). Intermediation in public procurement of innovation: how Amsterdam’s startup-in-residence programme connects startups to urban challenges. Research Policy, 48(9), 103789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.013