Working at the crossroads of structurationist and discursive approaches: A methodological tool for practice-based studies

Main Article Content

Marlei Pozzebon
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5380-908X
Natalia Aguilar Delgado
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2561-1970
Charo Rodriguez
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3799-8399

Abstract

In this paper we propose a methodological tool that seeks to contribute to the empirical study of practices in organization studies. There is a need for innovating and improving analytical tactics for theorizing about practice, particularly for helping connect localized social interactions to broader contexts. We propose the “temporal bracketing of discourses” tool and provide a detailed example that empirically illustrates its application.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
POZZEBON, M.; AGUILAR DELGADO, N. .; RODRIGUEZ, C. . Working at the crossroads of structurationist and discursive approaches: A methodological tool for practice-based studies . RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas , [S. l.], v. 61, n. 6, p. 1–17, 2021. DOI: 10.1590/S0034-759020210605. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rae/article/view/84899. Acesso em: 28 may. 2024.
Section
Articles

References

Balogun, J., Jarzabkowski, P., & Vaara, E. (2011). Selling, resistance and reconciliation: A critical discursive approach to subsidiary role evolution in MNEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(6), 765-786. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2011.13

Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observation of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31,78-108. doi:10.2307/2392767

Berthod, O., Grothe-Hammer, M., & Sydow, J. (2017). Network ethnography: A mixed-method approach for the study of practices in interorganizational settings. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 299-323. doi:10.1177/1094428116633872

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford university press.

Carter, C., Clegg, S. R., & Kornberger, M. (2008). Strategy as practice? Strategic Organization, 6(1), 83-99. doi: 10.1177/1476127007087154v

Cassell, C., & Bishop, V. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: Exploring themes, metaphors and stories. European Management Review, 16(1), 195-207. doi: 10.1111/emre.12176

Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis in organizational studies: Towards an integrationist methodology. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1213-1218. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00883.x

Cohen, I. J. (1989). Structuration theory: Anthony Giddens and the constitution of social life. New York, USA: St. Martin’s Press.

Cornelissen, J. P., Oswick, C., Christensen, L. T., & Phillips, N. (2008). Metaphor in organizational research: Context, modalities and implications for research – introduction. Organization Studies, 29(1), 7-22. doi: 10.1177/0170840607086634

Cunliffe, A. L. (2011). Crafting qualitative research: Morgan and Smircich 30 years on. Organizational Research Methods, 14(4), 647-673. doi: 10.1177/1094428110373658

Denis, J. L., Langley, A., & Rouleau, L. (2007). Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames. Human Relations, 60(1),179-215. doi: 10.1177/0018726707075288

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London, UK: Longman.

Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (Vol. 2, pp. 258-284). London, UK: Sage.

Feldman, M. S. (2004). Resources in emerging structures and processes of change. Organization Science, 15(3), 295-309. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0073

Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240-1253. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0612

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York, US: Pantheon Books.

Giddens, A. (1976). New rules of sociological method. New York, USA: Basic Books.

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley, USA: University of California Press.

Giddens, A. (1989). A reply to my critics. In D. Held & J. B. Thompson (Eds.), Social theory of modern societies: Anthony Giddens and his critics (pp. 249-301). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Giddens, A., & Pierson, C. (1998). Conversations with Anthony Giddens: Making sense of modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Gioia, D., & Pitre, E. (1990) Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584-596. doi: 10.5465/amr.1990.4310758

Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C., & Putnam, L. L. (2004). Introduction: Organizational discourse: Exploring the field. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 1-36). London, UK: Sage Publications.

Grant, D., Keenoy, T., & Oswick, C. (2001). Organizational discourse: Key contributions and challenges. International Studies of Management and Organization, 31(3), 5-24. doi: 10.1080/00208825.2001.11656818

Hardy, C. (2001). Researching organizational discourse. International Studies of Management and Organization, 31(3), 25-47.doi: 10.1080/00208825.2001.11656819

Held, D., & Thompson, J. B. (1989). Social theory of modern societies: Anthony Giddens and his critics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Heracleous, L. (2006). A tale of three discourses: The dominant, the strategic and the marginalized. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5),1059-1087. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00629.x

Heracleous, L. (2013). The employment of structuration theory in organizational discourse: Exploring methodological challenges. Management Communication Quarterly, 20(10),1-8. doi: 10.1177/0893318913504498

Heracleous, L., & Barrett, M. (2001). Organizational change as discourse: Communicative actions and deep structures in the context of information technology. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 755 778. doi: 10.5465/3069414v

Heracleous, L., & Jacobs, C. D. (2008). Understanding organizations through embodied metaphors. Organization Studies, 29(1), 45-78. doi: 10.1177/0170840607086637

Howard-Grenville, J. A. (2005). The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organization Science, 16(6), 618-636. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0150

Jarzabkowski, P. (2004). Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, 25, 529-560. doi: 10.1177/0170840604040675

Jarzabkowski, P. (2008). Shaping strategy as a structuration process. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 621-650. doi: 10.5465/amr.2008.33664922

Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J., & Seidl, D. (2007). Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective. Human Relations, 60(1), 5-27. doi: 10.1177/0018726707075703

Jarzabkowski, P., Bednarek, R., & Lê, J. K. (2014). Producing persuasive findings: Demystifying ethnographic textwork in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organization, 12(4), 274-287. doi: 10.1177/1476127014554575

Kouamé, S., & Langley, A. (2018). Relating microprocesses to macro‐outcomes in qualitative strategy process and practice research. Strategic Management Journal, 39(3), 559-581. doi: 10.1002/smj.2726

Kuhn, T. R., & Putnam, L. L. (2014). Discourse and communication. In P. S. Adler, P. Du Gay, G. Morgan, & M. Reed (Eds.), Oxford handbook of sociology, social theory and organization studies: Contemporary Currents (pp. 414-430). Oxford, UK: Oxford Handbooks.

Lacerda, D. S., & Brulon, V. (2013). Política das UPPs e espaços organizacionais precários: Uma análise de discurso. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 53(2), 130-141. doi: 10.1590/S0034-75902013000200002

Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691-710. doi: 10.5465/amr.1999.2553248

Lavarda, R. A. B., Canet-Giner, M., & Peris-Bonet, F. (2010). How middle managers contribute to strategy formation process: Connection of strategy processes and strategy. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 50(4), 358-370. doi:10.1590/S0034-75902010000400002

Leitch, S., & Palmer, I. (2010). Analysing texts in context: Current practices and new protocols for critical discourse analysis in organization studies. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1194-1212. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00884.x

Murtagh, L. (2007). Implementing a critically quasi-ethnographic approach. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 193-215

Nicolini, D. (2009). Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1391-1418. doi: 10.1177/0170840609349875

Novak, L., Brooks, J., Gadd, C., Anders, S., & Lorenzi, N. (2012). Mediating the intersections of organizational routines during the introduction of a health IT system. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(5), 552-569. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2012.2

Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11, 404-428. doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600

Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. Cambridge, UK: Sage Publications.

Phillips, N., & Oswick, C. (2012). Organizational discourse: Domains, debates, and directions. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1),435-481. doi: 10.5465/19416520.2012.681558

Pozzebon, M. (2004). The influence of a structurationist view on strategic management research. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 247-272. doi: j.1467-6486.2004.00431.x

Pozzebon, M., & Pinsonneault, A. (2005). Challenges in conducting empirical work using structuration theory: Learning from IT research. Organization studies, 26(9), 1353-1376. doi: 10.1177/0170840605054621

Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). The Sage handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London, UK: Sage Publications

Rodríguez, C., & Pozzebon, M. (2010). The implementation evaluation of primary care groups of practice: a focus on organizational identity. BMC Family Practice, 11(1), 1-10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-15

Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Seidl, D., & Whittington, R. (2014). Enlarging the strategy-as-practice research agenda: Towards taller and flatter ontologies. Organization Studies, 35(10), 1407-1421. doi: 10.1177/0170840614541886

Spee, A. P., & Jarzabkowski, P. (2011). Strategic planning as communicative process. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1217-1245. doi: 10.1177/0170840611411387

Taylor, J. R., Cooren, F., Giroux, N., & Robichaud, D. (1996). The communicational basis of organization: Between the conversation and the text. Communication Theory, 6(1), 1-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00118.x

Thompson, M. (2004). ICT, power, and developmental discourse: A critical analysis. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 20(4), 1-25. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-35634-1_17

Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R., & Vetter, E. (2000). Methods of text and discourse analysis. London, UK: Sage Publications

Tsoukas, H. (2017). Don't simplify, complexify: From disjunctive to conjunctive theorizing in organization and management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 54(2), 132-153. doi: 10.1111/joms.12219

Whittington, R. (2006). Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27, 613-634. doi: 10.1177/0170840606064101

Whittington, R. (2010). Giddens, structuration theory and strategy as practice. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (pp. 109-126). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. London, UK: Sage Publications

Artigos mais lidos escritos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)