Management contradictions on ¿corporate culture¿ dissemination: the case of a Brazilian state-owned company
Main Article Content
Abstract
The advocates of "corporate culture" proposals see the manager as an agent of consensus, capable of integrating others in a "single" culture. Those who oppose such proposals focus on the organizational alienation and exploitation enforced by managers. This article proposes to extrapolate this perspective of the manager simply as an agent of consensus. It points out its limitations, contrasting the origins and criticisms of "corporate culture" studies and underlining aspects that can lead the manager to disseminate differences and ambiguity. The argument is based on a study of a regional branch of the Brazilian Postal Service (Empresa Brasileira de Correios e Telégrafos - ECT). The data was collected in documents and semi-structured inter- views with 26 subjects at different managerial levels. Data treatment was based on content analysis, in search of patterns or recurrences of words, sentences, ideas or topics of interest. The study concluded that the manager cannot be considered only an element of consensus, since he or she disseminates integration as well as differen- tiation and fragmentation, permeated by personal, social and organizational goals and issues, and not limited by the company¿s interests.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Leite-da-Silva, A. R., Junquilho, G. S., Carrieri, A. de P., & Melo, M. C. de O. L. (2006). Management contradictions on ¿corporate culture¿ dissemination: the case of a Brazilian state-owned company. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 40(3), 357 a 384. Retrieved from https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6816
Issue
Section
Article
The Brazilian Journal of Public Administration (RAP) undertakes to contribute to the protection of authors’ intellectual rights. On this matter:
- It uses the Creative Commons BY (CC-BY) license for all texts it publishes, except when there is indication of specific holders of copyrights and property rights;
- It uses the similarity verification software of content - Plagiarism (Crossref Similarity Check);
- It takes actions to fight against plagiarism and ethical misconduct aligned with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Further information on the Code of Ethics adopted by RAP can be found in Ethical Standards and Code of Conduct.