Gender gap in Brazilian states and stakeholder analysis of the National Council for Women’s Rights

Main Article Content

Gabriel Oliveira Loiola Benigno
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1549-8326
Diego Mota Vieira
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1275-1648
Jessica Eloísa de Oliveira
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4549-6498

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the gender gap in Brazilian states and the actions of stakeholders of the National Council for Women’s Rights (NCWR). Two research was conducted in two steps. In the first step, a gender gap index in Brazilian states was calculated based on the Global Gender Gap Report (GGGR) methodology, prepared by the World Economic Forum. In the second, the NCWR stakeholders were mapped, and their performance was analyzed, considering the gender gap indexes obtained in the first step and the theoretical framework supported by stakeholder analysis models. The political and economic dimensions presented the worst performance. The Brazilian states with the best general indexes were Amapá, Distrito Federal, and Maranhão, and the worst were Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais, and Paraná. On the other hand, NCWR stakeholders acting in public policies related to the economic and political dimensions do not seem to have great relevance and influence capacity. Evidence indicates a concentration of policy efforts in areas where the country has good GGGR indicators (health and education).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Benigno, G. O. L., Vieira, D. M., & Oliveira, J. E. de. (2021). Gender gap in Brazilian states and stakeholder analysis of the National Council for Women’s Rights. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 55(2), 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220190398
Section
Article

References

Anglade, B., Useche, P., & Deere, C. D. (2017). Decomposing the gender wealth gap in Ecuador. World Development, 96, 19-31.

Bardin, L. (2009). Análise de conteúdo Lisboa, Portugal: Edições 70.

Desposato, S., & Norrander, B. (2008). The gender gap in Latin America: contextual and individual influences on gender and political participation. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 141-162.

Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2012). Entrando na arena? Gênero e a decisão de concorrer a um cargo eletivo. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, 8, 129-163.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach Boston, MA: Pitman.

Gomes, R. C., Liddle, J., & Gomes, L. O. M. (2010). A five-sided model of stakeholder influence. Public Management Review, 12(5), 701-724.

Hardy, C. (1996). Understanding power: bringing about strategic change British Journal of Management, 7(1), S3-S16.

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2018). Estatísticas de gênero: indicadores sociais das mulheres no Brasil Brasília, DF: Autor.

Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2018). Women in national parliaments Recuperado de https://data.ipu.org/women-ranking?month=9&year=2019

Lei Lei nº 7.353, de 29 de agosto de 1985 (1985). Cria o Conselho Nacional dos Direitos da Mulher. Brasília, DF. Recuperado de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/1980-1988/L7353.htm

Lei Lei nº 10.539, de 23 de setembro de 2002 (2002). Dispõe sobre a estruturação de órgãos, cria cargos em comissão no âmbito do Poder Executivo Federal, e dá outras providências. Brasília, DF. Recuperado de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/2002/L10539.htm

Lei Lei nº 10.683, de 28 de maio de 2003 (2003). Dispõe sobre a organização da Presidência da República e dos Ministérios, e dá outras providências. Brasília, DF. Recuperado de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/2003/L10.683.htm

Lei Lei nº 12.034, de 29 de setembro de 2009 (2009). Altera as Leis nº 9.096, nº 9.504 e nº 4.737. Brasília, DF . Recuperado de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2007-2010/2009/Lei/L12034.htm

Lei Lei nº 13.341, de 29 de setembro de 2016 (2016). Altera as Leis nº 10.683 e nº 11.890 e revoga a Medida Provisória nº 717. Brasília, DF . Recuperado de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2015-2018/2016/Lei/L13341.htm

Macaulay, F. (2010). Trickling up, down, and sideways gender policy and political opportunity in Brazil. In. N. Lebon, & E. Maier (Eds.), Women’s activism in Latin America and the Caribbean: engendering social justice, democratizing citizenship (pp. 273-288). New Jersey, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Medida Medida provisória nº 696, de 2 de outubro de 2015 (2015). Extingue e transforma cargos públicos e altera a Lei nº 10.683. Brasília, DF . Recuperado de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2015-2018/2015/Mpv/mpv696.htm

Melo, H. P. (2011). Uma avaliação do desempenho brasileiro no Global Gender Gap Index do Fórum Econômico Mundial. Caderno Espaço Feminino, 24(2), 537-552.

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of the who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.

Pinto, E. L., Andrade, H., Jr., & Luz, R. P. (2009). Pró-equidade de gênero: incorporando políticas de ação afirmativa no mundo do trabalho. Revista do Serviço Público, 60(4), 401-413.

Rad, E. H., Bayazidi, Y., Delavari, S., & Rezaei, S. (2016). Gender gap and inequality in health professionals’ income in Iran. Medical Journal of Bakırköy, 12(2), 74-79.

Sampieri, R. H., Collado, C. F., & Lucio, P. B. (2006). Metodologia da pesquisa São Paulo, SP: McGraw-Hill.

Savage, G. T., Nix, T. W., Whitehead, C. J., & Blair, J. D. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 5(2), 61-75.

Secretaria de Políticas para as Mulheres. (2013). Plano Nacional de Políticas para as Mulheres Brasília, DF : Autor .

Souza, C. (2006). Políticas públicas: uma revisão da literatura. Sociologias, (16), 20-45.

United Nations Development Programme . (2019). Human Development Report 2019 New York, NY: Autor.

World Economic Forum. (2018). Global Gender Gap Report 2018 Geneva, Switzerland: Autor.