Double standard in the classroom: analysis of socio-semantic categorization networks operated by teachers
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article analyzes categories operated by bureaucrats when classifying types of users and their effects on the distribution of services, observing contexts of high inequality and universal policies. We analyze how teachers, as street-level bureaucrats, implement the policy by categorizing different types of students. We adopt an analytical lens of cultural schemes, which considers that individuals internalize associations between official and social (informal) categories from their experiences. The analyzed data were collected through vignettes applied to 40 teachers from the municipal education system of São Paulo, Brazil. We analyzed the use of categories through socio-semantic and semantic networks of categorizations and the construction of referral networks. The results show that teachers simultaneously mobilize political and social categories and that the introduction of the variable vulnerability in cases opens space for the introduction of social categories that generate different types of treatment for students with similar behaviors.
Downloads
Article Details
The Brazilian Journal of Public Administration (RAP) undertakes to contribute to the protection of authors’ intellectual rights. On this matter:
- It uses the Creative Commons BY (CC-BY) license for all texts it publishes, except when there is indication of specific holders of copyrights and property rights;
- It uses the similarity verification software of content - Plagiarism (Crossref Similarity Check);
- It takes actions to fight against plagiarism and ethical misconduct aligned with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Further information on the Code of Ethics adopted by RAP can be found in Ethical Standards and Code of Conduct.
References
Basov, N., Breiger, R., & Hellsten, I. (2020). Socio-semantic and other dualities. Poetics, 78, 101433.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
Botelho, F., Madeira, R. A., & Rangel, M. A. (2015). Racial discrimination in grading: Evidence from Brazil. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(4), 37-52.
Brodkin, E. Z. (2012). Reflections on street‐level bureaucracy: past, present, and future. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 940-949.
Costa, M. I. S., & Lotta, G. S. (2021). De "doentes mentais" a "cidadãos": análise histórica da construção das categorias políticas na saúde mental no Brasil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 26(suppl 2), 3467-3489.
D’Andrade, R. (2005). Some methods for studying cultural cognitive structures. In N. Quinn (Ed.), Finding culture in talk (pp. 83-104). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dubois, V. (1999). La vie au guichet: Relation administrative et traitement de la misère. (2a ed.). Paris, France: Economica.
Epp, C. R., Maynard-Moody, S., & Haider-Markel, D. P. (2014). Pulled over: How police stops define race and citizenship. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
Evans, T. (2010). Professionals, managers and discretion: Critiquing street-level bureaucracy. The British Journal of Social Work, 41(2), 368-386.
Fassin, D., Bouagga, Y., Coutant, I., Eideliman, J. S., Fernandez, F., Fischer, N., ... Roux, S. (2015). At the Heart of the State. London, UK: Pluto Press.
Finch, J. (1987). The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology, 21(1), 105-114.
Frigotto, M. L., & Riccaboni, M. (2011). A few special cases: scientific creativity and network dynamics in the field of rare diseases. Scientometrics, 89(1), 397-420.
Fuhse, J., Stuhler, O., Riebling, J., & Martin, J. L. (2020). Relating social and symbolic relations in quantitative text analysis. A study of parliamentary discourse in the Weimar Republic. Poetics, 78, 101363.
Ghaziani, A., & Baldassarri, D. (2011). Cultural anchors and the organization of differences: A multi-method analysis of LGBT marches on Washington. American Sociological Review, 76(2), 179-206.
Godart, F. C., & Claes, K. (2017). Semantic Networks and the Market Interface: Lessons from Luxury Watchmaking. In P. Groenewegen, J. E. Ferguson, C. Moser, J. W. Mohr, & S. P. Borgatti (Eds.), Structure, Content and Meaning of Organizational Networks (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 53, pp. 113-141). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Harrits, G. S. (2019a). Stereotypes in context: How and when do street‐level bureaucrats use class stereotypes? Public Administration Review, 79(1), 93-103.
Harrits, G. S. (2019b). Using vignettes in street-level bureaucracy research. In P. Hupe (Ed.), Research Handbook on Street-Level Bureaucracy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Harrits, G. S., & Møller, M. Ø. (2011). Categories and categorization: towards a comprehensive sociological framework. Distinktion: Scandinavian journal of social theory, 12(2), 229-247.
Harrits, G. S., & Møller, M. Ø. (2013). Constructing at-risk target groups. Critical Policy Studies, 7(2), 155-176.
Hunzaker, M. F., & Valentino, L. (2019). Mapping cultural schemas: From theory to method. American Sociological Review, 84(5), 950-981.
Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106-131.
Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Lotta, G. S. (2015). Burocracia e implementação de políticas de saúde: os agentes comunitários na Estratégia Saúde da Família. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Editora Fiocruz.
Lotta, G. S. (2019). A política pública como ela é: contribuições dos estudos sobre implementação para a análise de políticas públicas. In G. S. Lotta (Org.), Teoria e análises sobre implementação de políticas públicas no Brasil. Brasília, DF: Enap.
Lotta, G. S., & Pires, R. (2019). Street-level bureaucracy research and social inequality. In P. Hupe (Ed.), Research Handbook on Street-Level Bureaucracy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2015). Playing the rules: Discretion in social and policy context. In P. Hupe, M. Hill, & A. Buffat (Eds.), Understanding street-level bureaucracy (pp. 169-86). Bristol, UK: University of Bristol.
Mohr, J. W. (1994). Soldiers, mothers, tramps and others: Discourse roles in the 1907 New York City charity directory. Poetics, 22(4), 327-357.
Møller, M. Ø. (2009). Solidarity and categorization: Solidarity perceptions and categorization practices among Danish social workers (Doctoral Dissertation). Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Møller, M. Ø., & Stensöta, H. O. (2019). Welfare state regimes and caseworkers’ problem explanation. Administration & Society, 51(9), 1425-1454.
Nunes, S., & Lomônaco, J. F. B. (2010). O aluno cego: preconceitos e potencialidades. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 14(1), 55-64.
Oliveira, M. M., & Carvalho, C. P. (2019). Enfrentando o fracasso escolar no nível local: a atuação discricionária de professores e diretores escolares na implementação de uma política educacional. In R. R. C. Pires (Org.), Implementando desigualdades: reprodução de desigualdades na implementação de políticas públicas. Brasília, DF: Ipea.
Oorschot, W. (2008). Solidarity towards immigrants in European welfare states. International Journal of Social Welfare, 17(1), 3-14.
Pires, R. R. C. (2019). Implementando desigualdades: reprodução de desigualdades na implementação de políticas públicas. Brasília, DF: Ipea.
Prottas, J. M. (1979). People processing: The street-level bureaucrat in public service bureaucracies. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Roth, C., & Cointet, J. P. (2010). Social and semantic coevolution in knowledge networks. Social Networks, 32(1), 16-29.
Rothstein, B. (1998). Just institutions matter: The moral and political logic of the universal welfare state. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press.
Rothstein, B. O., & Teorell, J. A. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, 21(2), 165- 190.
Schneider, A. L., & Ingram, H. M. (2005). Deserving and entitled: Social constructions and public policy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Schudson, M. (1989). How culture works. Theory and Society, 18(2), 153-180.
Soss, J., Fording, R. C., & Schram, S. F. (2011). Disciplining the poor: Neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
Stone, D. (2002). Policy paradox and political reason. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Strauss, C., & Quinn, N. (1997). A cognitive theory of cultural meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Zacka, B. (2017). When the state meets the street: Public service and moral agency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.