Comparative analysis of the industrial and innovation policies in South Korea and Brazil
Main Article Content
Abstract
South Korea stands out on the international stage due to substantial economic and social improvements over recent decades. A factor considered fundamental to the evolution of quality of life standards in South Korea is the long-term planning executed through its Five-Year Plans following the Korean War. The implementation of these Plans strengthened national industry and allocated high volumes of public investment to science and innovation, ensuring an increase in total factor productivity. Conversely, Brazil remains caught in the underdevelopment trap, showing limited progress in economic and social aspects, and lacking continuous long-term public policy planning for industrialization and innovation. This study was based on the literature regarding development and the countries' national plans. The results demonstrate that institutional continuity, long-term State coordination, the strengthening of technological capabilities, and investment in education, industry, and research and development were decisive for South Korean progress. This article contributes to the debate by identifying lessons for the Brazilian context and reinforcing the importance of forward-looking State policies to promote sustainable development and innovation.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RAP is committed to contributing to the protection of the author's intellectual rights. In this regard, it:
- Adopts the Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, provided that the original work is properly cited;
- Ensures moral and usage rights of the article to authors, in accordance with Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0. Authors retain the copyright to the published article, and the journal holds the right of first publication;
- Utilizes content similarity/plagiarism detection software (Crossref Similarity Check);
- Recommends the use of CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) authorship criteria;
- Adopts actions to combat plagiarism and ethical misconduct, aligned with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines;
- Reserves the right to make changes to the original versions regarding normative, spelling, and grammatical standards to maintain high linguistic quality and layout standardization, while respecting the authors' style. Subsequently, authors will receive the final versions for approval prior to publication.
Further information on the Code of Ethics adopted by RAP can be found in Ethical Standards and Code of Conduct.
References
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 29(2), 168-170. https://doi.org/10.1355/ae29-2j
Amsden, A. H. (1989). Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. Oxford University.
Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social. (2019). Financiamento do desenvolvimento. BNDES.
Bandeira, L. A. M. (2013). Formação do império americano. Civilização Brasileira.
Bank of Korea. (1969). Economic statistics yearbook. Han'guk Ŭnhaeng, Chosabu.
Bielschowsky, R. (2000). Pensamento econômico brasileiro: O ciclo ideológico do desenvolvimentismo (4th ed.). Contraponto.
Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2020). A construção política do Brasil: sociedade, economia e Estado desde a Independência. Ed. 34.
Chang, H.-J. (1994). The political economy of industrial policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Cumings, B. (1997). Korea’s place in the sun: a modern history. W. W. Norton & Company.
Draibe, S. (1985). Rumos e metamorfoses: um estudo sobre a constituição do Estado e as alternativas da industrialização no Brasil (1930-1960). Paz e Terra.
Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy: states and industrial transformation. Princeton University. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400821723
Fico, C. (2008). O grande irmão: da operação Brother Sam aos anos de chumbo. Civilização Brasileira.
Furtado, C. (2007). Formação econômica do Brasil (34th ed.). Companhia das Letras.
Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. R. (1995). The political economy of democratic transitions. Princeton University. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188010
Hyundai Motor Company. (2024). 2023 consolidated financial statements - Year ended December 31. https://www.hyundai.com/worldwide/en/company/ir/financial-information
Kim, E. M. (1997). Big business, strong state: collusion and conflict in South Korean development, 1960-1990. State University of New York Press.
Kim, H.-A. (2005). Korea’s development under Park Chung Hee: rapid industrialization, 1961–79. Routledge.
Kim, B.-K., & Vogel, E. F. (2011). The Park Chung Hee era: the transformation of South Korea. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061064
Koo, H. (1993). State and society in contemporary Korea. Cornell University Press.
Kwon, H.-J. (1999). The welfare state in Korea: the politics of legitimation. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230374294
Landman, T. (2008). Issues and methods in comparative politics: an introduction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203929780
Maddison, A. (2001). The world economy: a millennial perspective. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264189980-en
Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state: debunking public vs. private sector myths. Anthem.
Ministério do Planejamento e Orçamento. (s.d.). Estratégia Brasil 2050. https://www.gov.br/planejamento/pt-br/assuntos/planejamento/Brasil2050
Ministério do Planejamento, Desenvolvimento e Gestão. (2018). Estratégia nacional de desenvolvimento econômico e social (ENDES). http://antigo.sudam.gov.br/conteudo/menus/retratil/planos-desenvolvimento/prda/arquivos/2019/estrategia-nacional-de-desenvolvimento-economico-e-social.pdf
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
Oh, I., & Rowley, C. (2024). Corporate governance and firm legitimacy: Chaebol governance and political corruption in South Korea. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 25(1), 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1353/gia.2024.a9
Rodrik, D. (2007). One economics, many recipes: globalization, institutions, and economic growth. Princeton University. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcm4jbh
Sicsú, J., Paula, L. F., & Michel, R. (2005). Novo-desenvolvimentismo: Um projeto nacional de crescimento com equidade social. Manole; Fundação Konrad Adenauer.
Suzigan, W.; Furtado, J. Política industrial e desenvolvimento. Revista de Economia Política, 26(2), 163-185, 2006.
Tho, T. van. (1988). Export-oriented growth and technical progress in Korea (OECD Development Centre Papers, No. 5). OECD.
United States Patent and Trademark Office. (1997). Annual report 1997. https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/about/stratplan/ar/1997annualreport.pdf
Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187181
Woo, M. J.-E. (1991). Race to the swift: State and finance in Korean industrialization. Columbia University Press.
World Bank. (1987). Korea: managing the industrial transition.
World Bank. (1993). The East Asian miracle: economic growth and public policy.
World Bank. (1999). Korea and the knowledge-based economy: making the transition.
World Bank. (2025) World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/