Synchronous accountability forums: the internal dynamics of budget public hearings

Main Article Content

Tiemi Suzuki Mesquita
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5495-1149
Ricardo Rocha de Azevedo
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6302-0760

Abstract

Budget public hearings are spaces for transparency and social participation. These spaces can be considered synchronous accountability forums, where the rendering of accounts and the attribution of responsibilities can co-occur, raising concerns for the responsible parties about possible accountability models. This qualitative and interpretative research analyzed the dynamics of public budget hearings organized by Brazilian municipalities using semi-structured interviews with public managers. The results indicate that those responsible for public hearings adopt strategies minimizing reputational and accountability risks at different times: (i) in the preparation stage, with the definition of participation rules and the use of an informational filter; (ii) during execution, in the form of the presentation of information and in directing the public’s attention; and, (iii) in the post-hearing stage, through low transparency and document manipulation. The research contributes to understanding hearings as forums of expected accountability, in which the expectation of the authorities can direct the dynamics of public hearings, transforming them into a theater performance. The results have implications for the courts of accounts and the legislative branch, which could exercise greater control and inspection of the hearings; for society, which could act in a more active and organized way; and also for the legislation in force, which could establish clear guidelines for holding hearings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mesquita, T. S., & Azevedo, R. R. de. (2022). Synchronous accountability forums: the internal dynamics of budget public hearings. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 56(6), 799–822. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220220122
Section
Article

References

Abranches, S. (2018). Presidencialismo de coalizão: raízes e evolução do modelo político brasileiro. São Paulo, SP: Companhia das Letras.

Azevedo, R. R., & Aquino, A. C. B. (2016). O planejamento em municípios de pequeno porte em São Paulo. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 10(26), 63-76. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.11606/rco.v10i26.111202

Behr, D., Kaczmirek, L., Bandilla, W., & Braun, M. (2012). Asking probing questions in web surveys: which factors have an impact on the quality of responses? Social Science Computer Review, 30(4), 487-498. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439311435305

Bogner, A., Littig, B., & Menz, W. (2009). Introduction: expert interviews – an introduction to a new methodological debate. In A. Bogner, B. Littig, & W. Menz (Eds.), Interviewing Experts (Research Methods Series, pp. 1-13). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244276_1

Bohman, J., & Rehg, W. (1997). Deliberative democracy: essays on reason and politics. Debates in contemporary political philosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bovens, M. (2007a). New forms of accountability and EU-governance. Comparative European Politics, 5(1),104-120. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110101

Bovens, M. (2007b). Analysing and assessing accountability: a conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447-468. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x

Bragatti, M. R., Nascimento, V. L., & Carvalho, L. R. (2021). Um estudo sobre a percepção e participação popular nas audiências públicas realizadas no município de Nova Mutum - MT. Revista UNEMAT de Contabilidade, 10(19), 83-108. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.30681/ruc.v10i19.4205

Brelàz, G., & Alves, M. A. (2013). O processo de institucionalização da participação na Câmara Municipal de São Paulo: uma análise das audiências públicas do orçamento (1990-2010). Revista de Administracao Publica, 47(4), 803-826. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122013000400001

Brummel, L. (2021). Social accountability between consensus and confrontation: developing a theoretical framework for societal accountability relationships of public sector organizations. Administration & Society, 53(7), 1046-1077. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720988529

Busuioc, E. M., & Lodge, M. (2016). The reputational basis of public accountability. Governance, 29(2), 247-263. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12161

Busuioc, E. M., & Lodge, M. (2017). Reputation and accountability relationships: managing accountability expectations through reputation. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 91-100. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12612

Buttny, R. (2010). Citizen participation, metadiscourse, and accountability: a public hearing on a zoning change for wal-mart. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 636-659. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01507.x

Checkoway, B. (1981). The politics of public hearings. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17(4), 566-582. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638101700411

Cornwall, A., & Coelho, V. S. P. (2007). Spaces for change? The politics of citizen participation in new democratic arenas. London, UK: Zed Books.

Corona, V. P. (2007). Voices and visions of Lower Manhattan: organizing civic expression in post-9/11 public hearings. Journal of Civil Society, 3(2),119-135. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/17448680701554217

Costa, D. M. D. (2010). Vinte anos de orçamento participativo: análise das experiências em municípios. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 15(56), 8-28. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v15n56.3190

Davidson, C. (2009). Transcription: imperatives for qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(2), 35-52. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800206

Ebdon, C. (2002). Beyond the public hearing: citizen participation in the local government budget process. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 14(2), 273-294. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-14-02-2002-B006

Emenda Constitucional nº 86 de 17 de março de 2015. (2015). Altera os arts. 165, 166 e 198 da Constituição Federal, para tornar obrigatória a execução da programação orçamentária que especifica. Brasília, DF. Recuperado de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/emendas/emc/emc86.htm

Eschenfelder, K. R. (2004). Behind the web site: an inside look at the production of web-based textual government information. Government Information Quarterly, 21(3), 337-358. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2004.04.004

Esin, C., Fathi, M., & Squire, C. (2014). Narrative analysis: the constructionist approach. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis (pp. 203-216). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Fonseca, I. F., Rezende, R. R., Oliveira, M. S., & Pereira, A. K. (2014). Audiências públicas: fatores que influenciam seu potencial de efetividade no âmbito do Poder Executivo Federal. Revista do Serviço Público, 64(1), 7-29. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.21874/rsp.v64i1.113

Gaber, I. (2000). Lies, damn lies... and political spin. British Journalism Review, 11(1), 60-70. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/095647480001100111

Graton, L. H. T., Bonacim, C. A. G., & Sakurai, S. N. (2020). Práticas de barganha política por meio da execução orçamentária federal. Revista de Administração Pública, 54(5), 1361-1381. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220190399

Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2011). Being transparent or spinning the message? An experiment into the effects of varying message content on trust in government. Information Polity, 16(1), 35-50. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2011-0222

Hall, A. T., Frink, D. D., & Buckley, M. R. (2017). An accountability account: a review and synthesis of the theoretical and empirical research on felt accountability. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(2), 204-224. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2052

Hartz-Karp, J., & Briand, M. K. (2009). Institutionalizing deliberative democracy. Journal of Public Affairs, 9(2), 125-141. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.320

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2019). Perfil dos Municípios Brasileiros: 2019. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Autor.

Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada. (2019). Ipeadata. Disponível em http://ipeadata.gov.br

Jávor, I., & Jancsics, D. (2016). The role of power in organizational corruption: an empirical study. Administration and Society, 48(5), 527-558. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713514845

Kasymova, J. (2017). Understanding the challenges and sustainability of citizen engagement in the budgeting processes of developing countries. Administration and Society, 49(3), 374-393. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714558713

Kennedy, B. L., & Thornberg, R. (2018). Deduction, induction, and abduction. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection (pp. 49-64). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Lando, T. (2003). The public hearing process: a tool for citizen participation, or a path toward citizen alienation? National Civic Review, 92(1), 73-82. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1002/ncr.7

Lei Complementar nº 101, de 4 de maio de 2000. (2000). Estabelece normas de finanças públicas voltadas para a responsabilidade na gestão fiscal e dá outras providências. Brasília, DF. Recuperado de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/lcp/lcp101.htm

Lino, A. F., & Aquino, A. C. B. (2018). A diversidade dos Tribunais de Contas regionais na auditoria de governos. Revista Contabilidade e Financas, 29(76), 26-40. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201803640

Lino, A. F., Azevedo, R. R., Aquino, A. C. B., & Steccolini, I. (2022, março). Fighting or supporting corruption? The role of public sector audit organizations in Brazil. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 83, 102384. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102384

Mahler, J., & Regan, P. M. (2007). Crafting the message: controlling content on agency web sites. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 505-521. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2006.06.008

McKinnon, J. (1988). Reliability and validity in field research: some strategies and tactics. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 1(1), 34-54. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004619

Ministério Público Federal. (2016). Ranking Nacional dos Portais da Transparência. Brasília, DF: Autor.

Nowell, B., & Albrecht, K. (2019). A reviewer’s guide to qualitative rigor. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(2), 348-363. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy052

Overman, S., & Schillemans, T. (2022). Toward a public administration theory of felt accountability. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 12-22. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13417

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice (4a ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Patz, R., Thorvaldsdottir, S., & Goetz, K. H. (2022). Accountability and affective styles in administrative reporting: the case of UNRWA, 1951-2020. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(1), 111-129. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab024

Piotrowski, S., Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Deat, F. (2019). Numbers over narratives? How government message strategies affect citizens’ attitudes. Public Performance and Management Review, 42(5), 1005-1028. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2017.1400992

Power, M. K., & Gendron, Y. (2015). Qualitative research in auditing: a methodological roadmap. Auditing, 34(2), 147-165. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10423

Qu, S. Q., & Dumay, J. (2011). The qualitative research interview. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 8(3), 238-264. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1108/11766091111162070

Rapley, T. (2014). Sampling strategies in qualitative research. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis (pp. 49-64). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Rocha, A. C. (2013). A realização da accountability em pareceres prévios do Tribunal de Contas de Santa Catarina. Revista de Administração Pública, 47(4), 901-925. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122013000400005

Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science Technology and Human Values, 25(1), 3-29. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101

Sacramento, A. R. S., & Pinho, J. A. G. (2016). The process of implementing answerability in contemporary Brazil. Revista de Administração Pública, 50(2), 193-213. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612147614

Sander, J. A., & Pedralli, J. R. (2013). As audiências públicas enquanto práticas cerimoniais. Como torná-las de fato públicas? In Anais do 1o Seminário Nacional de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento, Curitiba, PR.

Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., … Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality and Quantity, 52(4), 1893-1907. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8

Schillemans, T. (2016). Calibrating public sector accountability: translating experimental findings to public sector accountability. Public Management Review, 18(9), 1400-1420. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1112423

Schillemans, T., Overman, S., Fawcett, P., Flinders, M., Fredriksson, M., Laegreid, P., Maggetti, M. et al. (2021). Understanding felt accountability. Governance, 34(3), 893-916. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12547

Taylor, J. (2011). The intimate insider: negotiating the ethics of friendship when doing insider research. Qualitative Research, 11(1), 3-22. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110384447

Tribunal de Contas do Estado de São Paulo. (2019). Lei de Responsabilidade Fiscal. São Paulo, SP: Autor.

Tribunal de Contas do Estado de São Paulo. (2020). COVID 19: Orientações para enfrentamento da crise. São Paulo, SP: Autor.

Topal, C. (2009). The construction of general public interest: risk, legitimacy, and power in a public hearing. Organization Studies, 30(2-3), 277-300. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608101481

Tribunal Superior Eleitoral. (2016). Informações sobre as Eleições 2016 para prefeito, vice-prefeito e vereador. Recuperado de https://www.tse.jus.br/eleicoes/eleicoes-anteriores/eleicoes-2016

Watkins, D. C. (2017). Rapid and rigorous qualitative data analysis: the “RADaR” technique for applied research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-9. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917712131

Yang, K. (2003). Assessing China’s public price hearings: symbolic aspects. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(5), 497-524. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-120019233

Yeong, M. L., Ismail, R., Ismail, N. H., & Hamzah, M. I. (2018). Interview protocol refinement: fine-tuning qualitative research interview questions for multi-racial populations in Malaysia. Qualitative Report, 23(11), 2700-2713. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3412

Zorzal, G., & Carlos, E. (2017). Audiências públicas do Legislativo estadual: fatores endógenos e exógenos na análise da efetividade da participação. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 25(64), 23-46. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-987317256402